GENERAL ENQUIRIES: Tel: + 27 12 841 2911 | Email: callcentre@csir.co.za

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Blanchard, R
dc.contributor.author O'Farrell, PJ
dc.contributor.author Richardson, DM
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-22T10:28:39Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-22T10:28:39Z
dc.date.issued 2014-04
dc.identifier.citation Blanchard, R, O’Farrell, PJ and Richardson, DM. 2014. Anticipating potential biodiversity conflicts for future biofuel crops in South Africa: incorporating spatial filters with species distribution models. Global Change Biology Bioenergy. DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12129 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1757-1693
dc.identifier.uri http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.12129/abstract
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8199
dc.description Copyright: 2014 Wiley, USA.This is a pre-print version. The definitive version of the work is published in GCB Bioenergy en_US
dc.description.abstract Liquid biofuel production will likely have its greatest impact through the large-scale changes in land use that will be required to meet the production of this energy source. In this study, we develop a framework which integrates species distribution models, land cover, land capability and various biodiversity conservation data to identify natural areas with (i) a potentially high risk of transformation for biofuel production and (ii) potential impact to biodiversity conservation areas. The framework was tested in the Eastern Cape of South Africa, a region which has been earmarked for the cultivation of biofuels. We expressly highlight the importance of biodiversity conservation data that enhance the protected area network to limit potential losses by comparing the overlap of areas likely to become cultivated with (i) protected areas; (ii) biodiversity hot spots not currently protected; and (iii) ‘ecological corridors’ (areas deemed important for the migration of species and linkages between important biodiversity areas). Results indicate that the introduction of spatial filters reduced available land from 54% to 45%. Including all biodiversity scenarios reduced available land to 15% of the Eastern Cape should avoiding conflict with biodiversity conservation areas be prioritized. The assumption that agriculturally marginal land offers a unique opportunity to be converted to biofuel crops does not consider the biodiversity value attached to these areas. We highlight that decisions relating to large-scale transformation and changes in land cover need to take account of broader ecological processes. Determining the spatial extent of threats to biodiversity facilitates the analysis of spatial conflict. This article demonstrates a proactive approach for anticipating likely habitat transformation and provides an objective means of mitigating potential conflict with existing land use and biodiversity. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;13612
dc.subject Bioenergy crops en_US
dc.subject Spatial fillers en_US
dc.subject MaxEnt en_US
dc.subject Agricultural land en_US
dc.subject Land suitability en_US
dc.subject Biodiversity en_US
dc.subject Spatial analysis en_US
dc.title Anticipating potential biodiversity conflicts for future biofuel crops in South Africa: incorporating spatial filters with species distribution models en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account