ResearchSpace

Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Meissner, Richard
dc.contributor.author Ramasar, V
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-11T10:59:42Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-11T10:59:42Z
dc.date.issued 2015-10
dc.identifier.citation Meissner, R and Ramasar, V. 2015. Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa. GeoJournal, Vol 80(5), pp. 689-709 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0343-2521
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8637
dc.description Copyright: 2015 Springer Verlag.Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published GeoJournal, Vol 80(5), pp. 689-709 en_US
dc.description.abstract Everyday international political economy (EIPE) offers an opportunity to rethink the role of individuals and citizenry in shaping governance of natural resources. In South Africa, significant progress has been made by government in re-shaping water governance since the end of apartheid in the early 1990s. The role of government in water governance and water politics has thus been emphasised to a large degree. This study looks at historical material to assess the role that water politics and EIPE has played in shaping the use and management of water resources in the country. Case studies are analysed of two quaternary catchments, A63E and A71L in the Limpopo River Basin, to show how everyday actions by different actors has shaped the current waterscape in the basin. Four events, namely, the politics of the Middle Iron Age State at Mapungubwe; the development of the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site; the management of water for the De Beers Venetia Diamond Mine; and the establishment of the Coal of Africa Limited colliery are discussed in terms of the agential power at play during each event. The conclusions of the study are that EIPE and reflexive agential power are important factors in water governance that can sometimes be ignored through neoliberal institutionalism. In the current and future governance of water in South Africa they can offer an alternative view of the role and importance of actors and pathways for development. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Verlag en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;14962
dc.subject Water governance en_US
dc.subject Natural resources governance en_US
dc.subject Limpopo River en_US
dc.subject Quaternary basin en_US
dc.subject Mapungubwe en_US
dc.title Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Meissner, R., & Ramasar, V. (2015). Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8637 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Meissner, Richard, and V Ramasar "Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8637 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Meissner R, Ramasar V. Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8637. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Meissner, Richard AU - Ramasar, V AB - Everyday international political economy (EIPE) offers an opportunity to rethink the role of individuals and citizenry in shaping governance of natural resources. In South Africa, significant progress has been made by government in re-shaping water governance since the end of apartheid in the early 1990s. The role of government in water governance and water politics has thus been emphasised to a large degree. This study looks at historical material to assess the role that water politics and EIPE has played in shaping the use and management of water resources in the country. Case studies are analysed of two quaternary catchments, A63E and A71L in the Limpopo River Basin, to show how everyday actions by different actors has shaped the current waterscape in the basin. Four events, namely, the politics of the Middle Iron Age State at Mapungubwe; the development of the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site; the management of water for the De Beers Venetia Diamond Mine; and the establishment of the Coal of Africa Limited colliery are discussed in terms of the agential power at play during each event. The conclusions of the study are that EIPE and reflexive agential power are important factors in water governance that can sometimes be ignored through neoliberal institutionalism. In the current and future governance of water in South Africa they can offer an alternative view of the role and importance of actors and pathways for development. DA - 2015-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Water governance KW - Natural resources governance KW - Limpopo River KW - Quaternary basin KW - Mapungubwe LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 0343-2521 T1 - Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa TI - Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8637 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record