ResearchSpace

Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Heeringa, W
dc.contributor.author De Wet, Febe
dc.contributor.author Van Huyssteen, GB
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-11T10:58:29Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-11T10:58:29Z
dc.date.issued 2015-07
dc.identifier.citation Heeringa, W, De Wet, F and Van Huyssteen, GB. 2015. Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol 47, pp. 1-18 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1726-541X
dc.identifier.uri http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/649/613
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8630
dc.description Copyright: 2015 University of Stellenbosch. Department of General Linguistics en_US
dc.description.abstract Following Den Besten’s (2009) desiderata for historical linguistics of Afrikaans, this article aims to contribute some modern evidence to the debate regarding the founding dialects of Afrikaans. From an applied perspective (i.e. human language technology), we aim to determine which West Germanic language(s) and/or dialect(s) would be best suited for the purposes of recycling speech resources for the benefit of developing speech technologies for Afrikaans. Being recognised as a West Germanic language, Afrikaans is first compared to Standard Dutch, Standard Frisian and Standard German. Pronunciation distances are measured by means of Levenshtein distances. Afrikaans is found to be closest to Standard Dutch. Secondly, Afrikaans is compared to 361 Dutch dialectal varieties in the Netherlands and North-Belgium, using material from the Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen, a series of dialect atlases compiled by Blancquaert and Pée in the period 1925-1982 which cover the Dutch dialect area. Afrikaans is found to be closest to the South-Holland dialectal variety of Zoetermeer; this largely agrees with the findings of Kloeke (1950). No speech resources are available for Zoetermeer, but such resources are available for Standard Dutch. Although the dialect of Zoetermeer is significantly closer to Afrikaans than Standard Dutch is, Standard Dutch speech resources might be a good substitute. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Stellenbosch. Department of General Linguistics en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;16045
dc.subject Human language technologies en_US
dc.subject Speech resources en_US
dc.subject Afrikaans language en_US
dc.subject Dutch language en_US
dc.subject Acoustic distance en_US
dc.title Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Heeringa, W., De Wet, F., & Van Huyssteen, G. (2015). Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8630 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Heeringa, W, Febe De Wet, and GB Van Huyssteen "Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8630 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Heeringa W, De Wet F, Van Huyssteen G. Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8630. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Heeringa, W AU - De Wet, Febe AU - Van Huyssteen, GB AB - Following Den Besten’s (2009) desiderata for historical linguistics of Afrikaans, this article aims to contribute some modern evidence to the debate regarding the founding dialects of Afrikaans. From an applied perspective (i.e. human language technology), we aim to determine which West Germanic language(s) and/or dialect(s) would be best suited for the purposes of recycling speech resources for the benefit of developing speech technologies for Afrikaans. Being recognised as a West Germanic language, Afrikaans is first compared to Standard Dutch, Standard Frisian and Standard German. Pronunciation distances are measured by means of Levenshtein distances. Afrikaans is found to be closest to Standard Dutch. Secondly, Afrikaans is compared to 361 Dutch dialectal varieties in the Netherlands and North-Belgium, using material from the Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen, a series of dialect atlases compiled by Blancquaert and Pée in the period 1925-1982 which cover the Dutch dialect area. Afrikaans is found to be closest to the South-Holland dialectal variety of Zoetermeer; this largely agrees with the findings of Kloeke (1950). No speech resources are available for Zoetermeer, but such resources are available for Standard Dutch. Although the dialect of Zoetermeer is significantly closer to Afrikaans than Standard Dutch is, Standard Dutch speech resources might be a good substitute. DA - 2015-07 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Human language technologies KW - Speech resources KW - Afrikaans language KW - Dutch language KW - Acoustic distance LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 1726-541X T1 - Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects TI - Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8630 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record