ResearchSpace

A social representations analysis of design science research

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naidoo, R
dc.contributor.author Van der Merwe, A
dc.contributor.author Gerber, A
dc.contributor.author Hevner, A
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-11T10:57:55Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-11T10:57:55Z
dc.date.issued 2015-07
dc.identifier.citation Naidoo, R, Van der Merwe, A, Gerber, A and Hevner A. 2015. A social representations analysis of design science research. South African Computer Journal, Vol 56, pp. 33-49 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1015-7999
dc.identifier.uri http://sacj.cs.uct.ac.za/index.php/sacj/article/view/274
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8627
dc.description Copyright: 2015 SACJ. en_US
dc.description.abstract Compared to positivist survey and interpretive case study research, design science research (DSR) is a relatively novel and unfamiliar research paradigm within the computing field in South Africa. In light of recent interest in the DSR paradigm, this study sought to investigate how local computing researchers familiarise themselves with an unfamiliar paradigm and what their perspectives of DSR are. Key theoretical concepts from social representations theory (SRT), such as 'anchoring' and 'objectification', were used to explore how researchers constructed their understanding of DSR. A visual approach was used to administer drawing and association tasks to two focus groups; each focus group comprised around 25 participants ranging from doctoral students to experienced researchers. The focus group discussions invoked interesting complementary and distinctive associations about the process and content of DSR, specifically when anchored in dominant and conventional research practices. The results also illustrated several ways in which DSR is objectified in drawings and metaphorical constructions. This study concludes that SRT is useful for exploring beliefs about novel and relatively unfamiliar research practices. This study also contributes to an enhanced understanding of how computing researchers adapt to changing research practices. The findings are developed into recommendations for introducing changes to research practices. These recommendations can be used to direct efforts to more appropriately accommodate changing research practices within the computing community to broaden knowledge generation. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SACJ en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;16027
dc.subject Design science research en_US
dc.subject Anchoring en_US
dc.subject Objectification en_US
dc.subject Social representations theories en_US
dc.subject Visual methods en_US
dc.title A social representations analysis of design science research en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Naidoo, R., Van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A., & Hevner, A. (2015). A social representations analysis of design science research. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8627 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Naidoo, R, A Van der Merwe, A Gerber, and A Hevner "A social representations analysis of design science research." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8627 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Naidoo R, Van der Merwe A, Gerber A, Hevner A. A social representations analysis of design science research. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8627. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Naidoo, R AU - Van der Merwe, A AU - Gerber, A AU - Hevner, A AB - Compared to positivist survey and interpretive case study research, design science research (DSR) is a relatively novel and unfamiliar research paradigm within the computing field in South Africa. In light of recent interest in the DSR paradigm, this study sought to investigate how local computing researchers familiarise themselves with an unfamiliar paradigm and what their perspectives of DSR are. Key theoretical concepts from social representations theory (SRT), such as 'anchoring' and 'objectification', were used to explore how researchers constructed their understanding of DSR. A visual approach was used to administer drawing and association tasks to two focus groups; each focus group comprised around 25 participants ranging from doctoral students to experienced researchers. The focus group discussions invoked interesting complementary and distinctive associations about the process and content of DSR, specifically when anchored in dominant and conventional research practices. The results also illustrated several ways in which DSR is objectified in drawings and metaphorical constructions. This study concludes that SRT is useful for exploring beliefs about novel and relatively unfamiliar research practices. This study also contributes to an enhanced understanding of how computing researchers adapt to changing research practices. The findings are developed into recommendations for introducing changes to research practices. These recommendations can be used to direct efforts to more appropriately accommodate changing research practices within the computing community to broaden knowledge generation. DA - 2015-07 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Design science research KW - Anchoring KW - Objectification KW - Social representations theories KW - Visual methods LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 1015-7999 T1 - A social representations analysis of design science research TI - A social representations analysis of design science research UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8627 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record