ResearchSpace

On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Beraki, Asmerom F
dc.contributor.author Landman, WA
dc.contributor.author DeWitt, D
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-16T10:22:38Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-16T10:22:38Z
dc.date.issued 2015-11
dc.identifier.citation Beraki, A.F., Landman, WA and DeWitt, D. 2015. On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120(21), pp 11151-11172 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0148-0227
dc.identifier.uri http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023839/full
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8549
dc.description Copyright: 2015 American Geophysical Union Wiley. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website en_US
dc.description.abstract The study compares one- and two-tiered forecasting systems as represented by the South African Weather Service Coupled Model and its atmosphere-only version. In this comparative framework, the main difference between these global climate models (GCMs) resides in the manner in which the sea surface temperature (SST) is represented. The models are effectively kept similar in all other aspects. This strategy may allow the role of coupling on the predictive skill differences to be better distinguished. The result reveals that the GCMs differ widely in their performances and the issue of superiority of one model over the other is mostly dependent on the ability to a priori determine an optimal global SST field for forcing the atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). Notwithstanding, the AGCM’s fidelity is reasonably reduced when the AGCM is constrained with persisting SST anomalies to the extent to which the coupled general circulation model’s superiority becomes noticeable. The result suggests that the boundary forcing coming from the optimal SST field plays a significant role in leveraging a reasonable equivalency in the predictive skill of the two GCM configurations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Geophysical Union Wiley en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;15930
dc.subject Atmospheric general circulation model en_US
dc.subject Climatological en_US
dc.subject Coupled model en_US
dc.subject Global climate models en_US
dc.subject Sea surface temperature en_US
dc.subject Seasonal forecasting en_US
dc.subject Temporal differences en_US
dc.subject Uncoupled models en_US
dc.title On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Beraki, A. F., Landman, W., & DeWitt, D. (2015). On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8549 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Beraki, Asmerom F, WA Landman, and D DeWitt "On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8549 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Beraki AF, Landman W, DeWitt D. On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8549. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Beraki, Asmerom F AU - Landman, WA AU - DeWitt, D AB - The study compares one- and two-tiered forecasting systems as represented by the South African Weather Service Coupled Model and its atmosphere-only version. In this comparative framework, the main difference between these global climate models (GCMs) resides in the manner in which the sea surface temperature (SST) is represented. The models are effectively kept similar in all other aspects. This strategy may allow the role of coupling on the predictive skill differences to be better distinguished. The result reveals that the GCMs differ widely in their performances and the issue of superiority of one model over the other is mostly dependent on the ability to a priori determine an optimal global SST field for forcing the atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). Notwithstanding, the AGCM’s fidelity is reasonably reduced when the AGCM is constrained with persisting SST anomalies to the extent to which the coupled general circulation model’s superiority becomes noticeable. The result suggests that the boundary forcing coming from the optimal SST field plays a significant role in leveraging a reasonable equivalency in the predictive skill of the two GCM configurations. DA - 2015-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Atmospheric general circulation model KW - Climatological KW - Coupled model KW - Global climate models KW - Sea surface temperature KW - Seasonal forecasting KW - Temporal differences KW - Uncoupled models LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 0148-0227 T1 - On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled TI - On the comparison between seasonal predictive skill of global circulation models: Coupled versus uncoupled UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8549 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record