ResearchSpace

Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Coetzee, M
dc.contributor.author Waldeck, L
dc.contributor.author Le Roux, Alize
dc.contributor.author Meiklejohn, C
dc.contributor.author Van Niekerk, Cornelia W
dc.contributor.author Leuta, T
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-12T07:40:48Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-12T07:40:48Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05
dc.identifier.citation Coetzee, M, Waldeck, L, Le Roux, A, Meiklejohn, C, Van Niekerk, W and Leuta, T. 2014. Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure. Town and Regional Planning, Vol. 64, pp 1-9. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1012-280X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272
dc.description Copyright: 2014: University of the Free State (UoFS) en_US
dc.description.abstract This article is based on the assumption that more spatially efficient investment choices in both economic and basic infrastructure spending can make a significant impact on the equity, efficiency and sustainability of human settlements. Emerging from work conducted as part of a Department of Science and Technology (DST)-funded Integrated Planning and Development Modelling (IPDM) project, the article argues that decisions about infrastructure investment in South African metropolitan areas ought to be grounded in robust and rigorous analysis and scenario evaluation. More evidence, and better evidence, an understanding of spatial trends and the underlying forces that shape them, are needed to support planning and infrastructure investment. Urban simulation platforms offer valuable tools in this regard. Findings of simulation work in three metropolitan areas (eThekwini, Nelson Mandela Bay and Johannesburg) are presented to demonstrate this, and some implications for spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment are highlighted. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of the Free State (UoFS) en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;14693
dc.subject Integrated planning and development modelling en_US
dc.subject Spatial planning en_US
dc.subject Metropolitan areas en_US
dc.title Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Coetzee, M., Waldeck, L., Le Roux, A., Meiklejohn, C., Van Niekerk, C. W., & Leuta, T. (2014). Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Coetzee, M, L Waldeck, Alize Le Roux, C Meiklejohn, Cornelia W Van Niekerk, and T Leuta "Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities." (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Coetzee M, Waldeck L, Le Roux A, Meiklejohn C, Van Niekerk CW, Leuta T. Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Coetzee, M AU - Waldeck, L AU - Le Roux, Alize AU - Meiklejohn, C AU - Van Niekerk, Cornelia W AU - Leuta, T AB - This article is based on the assumption that more spatially efficient investment choices in both economic and basic infrastructure spending can make a significant impact on the equity, efficiency and sustainability of human settlements. Emerging from work conducted as part of a Department of Science and Technology (DST)-funded Integrated Planning and Development Modelling (IPDM) project, the article argues that decisions about infrastructure investment in South African metropolitan areas ought to be grounded in robust and rigorous analysis and scenario evaluation. More evidence, and better evidence, an understanding of spatial trends and the underlying forces that shape them, are needed to support planning and infrastructure investment. Urban simulation platforms offer valuable tools in this regard. Findings of simulation work in three metropolitan areas (eThekwini, Nelson Mandela Bay and Johannesburg) are presented to demonstrate this, and some implications for spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment are highlighted. DA - 2014-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Integrated planning and development modelling KW - Spatial planning KW - Metropolitan areas LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2014 SM - 1012-280X T1 - Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities TI - Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record