ResearchSpace

SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Landman, WA
dc.contributor.author Beraki, Asmerom F
dc.contributor.author DeWitt, D
dc.contributor.author Lötter, D
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-24T13:36:08Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-24T13:36:08Z
dc.date.issued 2014-10
dc.identifier.citation Landman, W.A, Beraki, A.F., DeWitt, D and Lötter, D. 2014. SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa. Water SA, vol.40(4), pp 615-622 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.uri http://www.ajol.info/index.php/wsa/article/view/108048/97873
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7735
dc.description Copyright: 2014 Water Research Commission. This is an ABSTRACT ONLY. The definitive version is published in Water SA, vol. 40(4), pp 615-622 en_US
dc.description.abstract Seasonal-to-interannual hindcasts (re-forecasts) for December-January-February (DJF) produced at a 1-month lead-time by the ECHAM4.5 atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) are verified after calibrating model output to DJF rainfall at 94 districts across South Africa. The AGCM is forced with SST forecasts produced by (i) statistically predicted SSTs, and (ii) predicted SSTs from a dynamically coupled ocean-atmosphere model. The latter SST forecasts in turn consist of an ensemble mean of SST forecasts, and also by considering the individual ensemble members of the SST forecasts. Probabilistic hindcasts produced for two separate category thresholds are verified over a 24-year test period from 1978/79 to 2001/02 by investigating the various AGCM configurations’ attributes of discrimination (whether the forecasts are discernibly different given different outcomes) and reliability (whether the confidence communicated in the forecasts is appropriate). Deterministic hindcast skill is additionally calculated through a range of correlation estimates between hindcast and observed DJF rainfall. For both probabilistic and deterministic verification the hindcasts produced by forcing the AGCM with dynamically predicted SSTs attain higher skill levels than the AGCM forced with statistical SSTs. Moreover, ensemble mean SST forecasts lead to improved skill over forecasts that considered an ensemble distribution of SST forecasts. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;13555
dc.subject Atmospheric general circulation model en_US
dc.subject AGCM en_US
dc.subject Seasonal forecasting en_US
dc.subject Mid-summer rainfall predictions en_US
dc.subject South African rainfall predictions en_US
dc.title SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Landman, W., Beraki, A. F., DeWitt, D., & Lötter, D. (2014). SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7735 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Landman, WA, Asmerom F Beraki, D DeWitt, and D Lötter "SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa." (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7735 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Landman W, Beraki AF, DeWitt D, Lötter D. SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7735. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Landman, WA AU - Beraki, Asmerom F AU - DeWitt, D AU - Lötter, D AB - Seasonal-to-interannual hindcasts (re-forecasts) for December-January-February (DJF) produced at a 1-month lead-time by the ECHAM4.5 atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) are verified after calibrating model output to DJF rainfall at 94 districts across South Africa. The AGCM is forced with SST forecasts produced by (i) statistically predicted SSTs, and (ii) predicted SSTs from a dynamically coupled ocean-atmosphere model. The latter SST forecasts in turn consist of an ensemble mean of SST forecasts, and also by considering the individual ensemble members of the SST forecasts. Probabilistic hindcasts produced for two separate category thresholds are verified over a 24-year test period from 1978/79 to 2001/02 by investigating the various AGCM configurations’ attributes of discrimination (whether the forecasts are discernibly different given different outcomes) and reliability (whether the confidence communicated in the forecasts is appropriate). Deterministic hindcast skill is additionally calculated through a range of correlation estimates between hindcast and observed DJF rainfall. For both probabilistic and deterministic verification the hindcasts produced by forcing the AGCM with dynamically predicted SSTs attain higher skill levels than the AGCM forced with statistical SSTs. Moreover, ensemble mean SST forecasts lead to improved skill over forecasts that considered an ensemble distribution of SST forecasts. DA - 2014-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Atmospheric general circulation model KW - AGCM KW - Seasonal forecasting KW - Mid-summer rainfall predictions KW - South African rainfall predictions LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2014 SM - 0378-4738 T1 - SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa TI - SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7735 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record