ResearchSpace

Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nienaber, S
dc.contributor.author Funke, Nicola S
dc.date.accessioned 2014-08-04T12:02:15Z
dc.date.available 2014-08-04T12:02:15Z
dc.date.issued 2012-10
dc.identifier.citation Nienaber, S and Funke, N. 2012. Comment on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012) Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government. Water SA, vol. 38(5), pp 838-840 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.uri http://www.wrc.org.za/Knowledge%20Hub%20Documents/Water%20SA%20Journals/Manuscripts/2012/05%20October%202012/2677%20comment.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7558
dc.description Copyright: 2012 Water Research Commission. Published in Water SA, vol. 38, pp 838-840 en_US
dc.description.abstract This article is a response to comments made by Ngcobo and Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government. The three points of critique by Ngcobo and Mlambo are addressed, supplemented by an explanation of the intent of the original article, and a clarification on the target-audience and focus of the original article. The authors of the paper do not advocate a unidirectional view of science simply feeding into policy. Instead, they see the science-policy interface as being situated within a complex, multidirectional context where multiple actors compete to influence policy-making processes. They state that if science, as one voice in this context, hopes to have an impact on policy, scientists need to be equipped with insights about the complexity within policy-making and also need to actively engage and collaborate with a range of actors in and beyond government. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;10071
dc.subject Science policies en_US
dc.subject NFEPA en_US
dc.subject Conservation science en_US
dc.subject Policy making en_US
dc.subject Scientific community en_US
dc.title Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Nienaber, S., & Funke, N. S. (2012). Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7558 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Nienaber, S, and Nicola S Funke "Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government." (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7558 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Nienaber S, Funke NS. Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7558. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Nienaber, S AU - Funke, Nicola S AB - This article is a response to comments made by Ngcobo and Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government. The three points of critique by Ngcobo and Mlambo are addressed, supplemented by an explanation of the intent of the original article, and a clarification on the target-audience and focus of the original article. The authors of the paper do not advocate a unidirectional view of science simply feeding into policy. Instead, they see the science-policy interface as being situated within a complex, multidirectional context where multiple actors compete to influence policy-making processes. They state that if science, as one voice in this context, hopes to have an impact on policy, scientists need to be equipped with insights about the complexity within policy-making and also need to actively engage and collaborate with a range of actors in and beyond government. DA - 2012-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Science policies KW - NFEPA KW - Conservation science KW - Policy making KW - Scientific community LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2012 SM - 0378-4738 T1 - Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government TI - Response to comments made by M Ngcobo and MC Mlambo on: Funke N and Nienaber S (2012), Promoting uptake and use of conservation science in South Africa by government UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7558 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record