ResearchSpace

Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wessels, Konrad J
dc.contributor.author Van den Bergh, F
dc.contributor.author Scholes, RJ
dc.date.accessioned 2012-09-11T09:16:51Z
dc.date.available 2012-09-11T09:16:51Z
dc.date.issued 2012-10
dc.identifier.citation Wessels, KJ, Van den Bergh, F and Scholes, RJ. 2012. Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 125, pp. 10-22 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0034-4257
dc.identifier.uri http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425712002581
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6089
dc.description Copyright: 2012 Elsevier. This is an ABSTRACT ONLY. en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper demonstrates a simulation approach for testing the sensitivity of linear and non-parametric trend analysis methods applied to remotely sensed vegetation index data for the detection of land degradation. The intensity, rate and timing of reductions in seasonally-summed NDVI are systematically varied on sample data to simulate land degradation, after which the trend analysis was applied and its sensitivity evaluated. The study was based on a widely-used, 1 km2 AVHRR data set for a test area in southern Africa. The trends were the most negative and significant when the degradation was introduced rapidly (over a period of 2–5 years) and in the middle of a 16-year time series. The seasonally-summed NDVI needs to be reduced by 30–40% before a significant negative linear slope or Kendall's correlation coefficient was apparent, given an underlying positive trend caused by rainfall. The seasonally-summed data were reordered to remove this underlying positive trend, before simulating degradation again. With no underlying positive trend present, degradation of 20% resulted in significant negative trends. Since areas widely agreed to be degraded show only 10–20% reductions compared to non-degraded areas, this raises doubts over the ability of trend analyses to detect degradation in a timely way in the presence of underling environmental trends. Residual Trends Analysis (RESTREND) was applied in an attempt to correct for variability and trends in rainfall. However, a simulated degradation intensity =20% caused the otherwise strong relationship between NDVI and rainfall to break down, making the RESTREND an unreliable indicator of land degradation. The results of such analyses will vary between different environments and need to be tested for sample areas across regions. Although the paper does not claim to solve the challenge of detecting land degradation amidst rainfall variability, it introduces a method of assessing the sensitivity of land degradation monitoring using remote sensing data. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;9379
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;9363
dc.subject Desertification en_US
dc.subject Change detection en_US
dc.subject Land degradation en_US
dc.subject Environmental remote sensing en_US
dc.subject NDVI time series data en_US
dc.title Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Wessels, K. J., Van den Bergh, F., & Scholes, R. (2012). Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6089 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Wessels, Konrad J, F Van den Bergh, and RJ Scholes "Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data." (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6089 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Wessels KJ, Van den Bergh F, Scholes R. Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6089. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Wessels, Konrad J AU - Van den Bergh, F AU - Scholes, RJ AB - This paper demonstrates a simulation approach for testing the sensitivity of linear and non-parametric trend analysis methods applied to remotely sensed vegetation index data for the detection of land degradation. The intensity, rate and timing of reductions in seasonally-summed NDVI are systematically varied on sample data to simulate land degradation, after which the trend analysis was applied and its sensitivity evaluated. The study was based on a widely-used, 1 km2 AVHRR data set for a test area in southern Africa. The trends were the most negative and significant when the degradation was introduced rapidly (over a period of 2–5 years) and in the middle of a 16-year time series. The seasonally-summed NDVI needs to be reduced by 30–40% before a significant negative linear slope or Kendall's correlation coefficient was apparent, given an underlying positive trend caused by rainfall. The seasonally-summed data were reordered to remove this underlying positive trend, before simulating degradation again. With no underlying positive trend present, degradation of 20% resulted in significant negative trends. Since areas widely agreed to be degraded show only 10–20% reductions compared to non-degraded areas, this raises doubts over the ability of trend analyses to detect degradation in a timely way in the presence of underling environmental trends. Residual Trends Analysis (RESTREND) was applied in an attempt to correct for variability and trends in rainfall. However, a simulated degradation intensity =20% caused the otherwise strong relationship between NDVI and rainfall to break down, making the RESTREND an unreliable indicator of land degradation. The results of such analyses will vary between different environments and need to be tested for sample areas across regions. Although the paper does not claim to solve the challenge of detecting land degradation amidst rainfall variability, it introduces a method of assessing the sensitivity of land degradation monitoring using remote sensing data. DA - 2012-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Desertification KW - Change detection KW - Land degradation KW - Environmental remote sensing KW - NDVI time series data LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2012 SM - 0034-4257 T1 - Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data TI - Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6089 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record