dc.contributor.author |
Booth, R
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Meyer, T
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sombattheera, C
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-07-26T13:36:25Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-07-26T13:36:25Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Booth, R, Meyer, T and Sombattheera, C. 2012. A general family of preferential belief removal operators. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 41(4), pp 711-733 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0022-3611 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f6368324072g3344/
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f6368324072g3344/fulltext.pdf
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6012
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: 2012 Springer. This is the post-print version of the work. The definitive version is published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 41(4), pp 711-733 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Most belief change operators in the AGM tradition assume an underlying plausibility ordering over the possible worlds which is transitive and complete. A unifying structure for these operators, based on supplementing the plausibility ordering with a second, guiding, relation over the worlds was presented in Booth et al. (Artif Intell 174:1339–1368, 2010). However it is not always reasonable to assume completeness of the underlying ordering. In this paper we generalise the structure of Booth et al. (Artif Intell 174:1339–1368, 2010) to allow incomparabilities between worlds. We axiomatise the resulting class of belief removal functions, and show that it includes an important family of removal functions based on finite prioritised belief bases. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Springer |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;9304 |
|
dc.subject |
Belief revision |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Belief removal |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Belief contraction |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Belief change |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Plausibility orderings |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Finite belief bases |
en_US |
dc.title |
A general family of preferential belief removal operators |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Booth, R., Meyer, T., & Sombattheera, C. (2012). A general family of preferential belief removal operators. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6012 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Booth, R, T Meyer, and C Sombattheera "A general family of preferential belief removal operators." (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6012 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Booth R, Meyer T, Sombattheera C. A general family of preferential belief removal operators. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6012. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Booth, R
AU - Meyer, T
AU - Sombattheera, C
AB - Most belief change operators in the AGM tradition assume an underlying plausibility ordering over the possible worlds which is transitive and complete. A unifying structure for these operators, based on supplementing the plausibility ordering with a second, guiding, relation over the worlds was presented in Booth et al. (Artif Intell 174:1339–1368, 2010). However it is not always reasonable to assume completeness of the underlying ordering. In this paper we generalise the structure of Booth et al. (Artif Intell 174:1339–1368, 2010) to allow incomparabilities between worlds. We axiomatise the resulting class of belief removal functions, and show that it includes an important family of removal functions based on finite prioritised belief bases.
DA - 2012-05
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Belief revision
KW - Belief removal
KW - Belief contraction
KW - Belief change
KW - Plausibility orderings
KW - Finite belief bases
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2012
SM - 0022-3611
T1 - A general family of preferential belief removal operators
TI - A general family of preferential belief removal operators
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6012
ER -
|
en_ZA |