ResearchSpace

Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Everson, CS
dc.contributor.author Dye, PJ
dc.contributor.author Gush, Mark B
dc.contributor.author Everson, TM
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T13:35:04Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T13:35:04Z
dc.date.issued 2011-12
dc.identifier.citation Everson, C.S., Dye, P.J., Gush, M.B. and Everson, T.M. 2011. Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests. Water SA, Vol 37(5), pp 781-788 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.uri http://www.wrc.org.za
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5532
dc.description Copyright: 2011 Water Research Commission en_US
dc.description.abstract The biotic and abiotic components of ecosystems affect each other through complex interactions and processes. These dynamic interactions give ecosystems their distinct identities and provide ecosystem services critical to human survival (e.g. water, energy and nutrients). However, human activities (e.g. commercial forestry, agriculture) have placed increasing demands on specific ecosystem services. The effect of these activities on ecosystem processes has been the focus of numerous Water Research Commission (WRC) studies. Some of these have determined man’s impact on plant-water use, biomass production (energy) and water use efficiency (biomass produced per unit of water transpired, termed productive green-water use). For example, measurements of evapotranspiration (ETa) from different vegetation types showed that annual water use is strongly related to the proportion of the year in which a dense canopy of transpiring leaves is maintained. Thus, evergreen vegetation such as riparian fynbos and plantations of introduced tree species exhibit a relatively high annual ETa, when compared to seasonal grasslands and deciduous trees that only maintain their transpiring canopy during summer. Quantification of the annual volumes of water used by these different vegetation types, under differing climatic and site conditions, has been possible through these studies. At a stand scale, measurements of the different components of evapotranspiration have allowed the partitioning of beneficial (transpiration) and non-beneficial (evaporation) fluxes. At a catchment scale measurements have quantified the proportional allocation of water to the different components of the water balance. Three case studies are presented to illustrate this. In a stand of Jatropha curcas, measurements of daily total evaporation rates during December to February (summer) on clear hot days ranged between 3 mm·d-1 to 4 mm·d-1. However, due to the deciduous nature of the species, water use was negligible (< 1 mm·d-1) during winter (May to August). At a catchment scale, studies in a montane grassland ecosystem of the KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg showed that the partitioning of the main hydrological fluxes into streamflow and evaporation was dependent on the wetness of the hydrological year. In average to wet years (>1 200 mm precipitation) the hydrological flux was equally split between evaporation (650 mm) and runoff (550 mm), while in drier years evaporation became the dominating component of the water balance (752 mm vs. 356 mm, respectively). The data provided an important baseline for comparison with other impacted ecosystems (especially commercial forestry). Finally, results of a variety of studies on the growth and water use of indigenous trees growing in natural forest and plantation systems suggest that, compared to introduced tree species, indigenous species use substantially less water, show lower water use efficiency, and grow more slowly. Advantages to such indigenous systems potentially include lower management costs, higher product values, a wider range of non-wood products and a lower hydrological impact. Their usefulness may be greatest on sensitive sites (e.g. riparian zones, water-stressed catchments, land cleared of alien plants, land with a high erosion risk, degraded forest) where land use systems with a reduced environmental impact are required. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow request;7930
dc.subject Evaporation en_US
dc.subject Transpiration en_US
dc.subject Grasslands en_US
dc.subject Indigenous trees en_US
dc.subject Jatropha curcas en_US
dc.subject Grassland water use en_US
dc.subject Indigenous forests en_US
dc.title Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Everson, C., Dye, P., Gush, M. B., & Everson, T. (2011). Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5532 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Everson, CS, PJ Dye, Mark B Gush, and TM Everson "Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests." (2011) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5532 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Everson C, Dye P, Gush MB, Everson T. Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests. 2011; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5532. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Everson, CS AU - Dye, PJ AU - Gush, Mark B AU - Everson, TM AB - The biotic and abiotic components of ecosystems affect each other through complex interactions and processes. These dynamic interactions give ecosystems their distinct identities and provide ecosystem services critical to human survival (e.g. water, energy and nutrients). However, human activities (e.g. commercial forestry, agriculture) have placed increasing demands on specific ecosystem services. The effect of these activities on ecosystem processes has been the focus of numerous Water Research Commission (WRC) studies. Some of these have determined man’s impact on plant-water use, biomass production (energy) and water use efficiency (biomass produced per unit of water transpired, termed productive green-water use). For example, measurements of evapotranspiration (ETa) from different vegetation types showed that annual water use is strongly related to the proportion of the year in which a dense canopy of transpiring leaves is maintained. Thus, evergreen vegetation such as riparian fynbos and plantations of introduced tree species exhibit a relatively high annual ETa, when compared to seasonal grasslands and deciduous trees that only maintain their transpiring canopy during summer. Quantification of the annual volumes of water used by these different vegetation types, under differing climatic and site conditions, has been possible through these studies. At a stand scale, measurements of the different components of evapotranspiration have allowed the partitioning of beneficial (transpiration) and non-beneficial (evaporation) fluxes. At a catchment scale measurements have quantified the proportional allocation of water to the different components of the water balance. Three case studies are presented to illustrate this. In a stand of Jatropha curcas, measurements of daily total evaporation rates during December to February (summer) on clear hot days ranged between 3 mm·d-1 to 4 mm·d-1. However, due to the deciduous nature of the species, water use was negligible (< 1 mm·d-1) during winter (May to August). At a catchment scale, studies in a montane grassland ecosystem of the KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg showed that the partitioning of the main hydrological fluxes into streamflow and evaporation was dependent on the wetness of the hydrological year. In average to wet years (>1 200 mm precipitation) the hydrological flux was equally split between evaporation (650 mm) and runoff (550 mm), while in drier years evaporation became the dominating component of the water balance (752 mm vs. 356 mm, respectively). The data provided an important baseline for comparison with other impacted ecosystems (especially commercial forestry). Finally, results of a variety of studies on the growth and water use of indigenous trees growing in natural forest and plantation systems suggest that, compared to introduced tree species, indigenous species use substantially less water, show lower water use efficiency, and grow more slowly. Advantages to such indigenous systems potentially include lower management costs, higher product values, a wider range of non-wood products and a lower hydrological impact. Their usefulness may be greatest on sensitive sites (e.g. riparian zones, water-stressed catchments, land cleared of alien plants, land with a high erosion risk, degraded forest) where land use systems with a reduced environmental impact are required. DA - 2011-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Evaporation KW - Transpiration KW - Grasslands KW - Indigenous trees KW - Jatropha curcas KW - Grassland water use KW - Indigenous forests LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2011 SM - 0378-4738 T1 - Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests TI - Water use of grasslands, agroforestry systems and indigenous forests UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5532 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record