ResearchSpace

Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Long, Craig S
dc.contributor.author Loveday, Philip W
dc.contributor.author Groenwold, AA
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-15T14:10:17Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-15T14:10:17Z
dc.date.issued 2009-09
dc.identifier.citation Long, CS, Loveday, PW and Groenwold, AA. 2009. Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 45(11). pp 817-825 en
dc.identifier.issn 0168-874X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X09000948
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.027
dc.description Copyright: 2009 Elsevier. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in the journal, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 45(11), pp 817-825 en
dc.description.abstract The effects of selected membrane, plate and flat shell finite element formulations on optimal topologies are numerically investigated. Two different membrane components are considered. The first is a standard 4-node bilinear quadrilateral, and the other is a 4-node element accounting for in-plane (drilling) rotations. Plate elements selected for evaluation include the discrete Kirchhoff quadrilateral (DKQ) element and two Mindlin–Reissner-based elements, one employing selective reduced integration (SRI), and the other an assumed natural strain (ANS) formulation. The effect of hourglass control on SRI elements is also evaluated. The flat shell elements consist of an assemblage of these membrane and plate components. The Mindlin–Reissner elements are shown to recover the thin plate result computed using DKQ elements. However, optimal topology is shown to be dependent on plate element formulation as thickness increases. Furthermore, a new benchmark problem is introduced illustrating the deficiencies of Mindlin–Reissner elements employing SRI without hourglass control. For shell problems, elements which properly account for in-plane rotations are shown to be insensitive to the penalty parameter which enforces the relationship between in-plane rotations and displacements, in contrast to the situation when an ad hoc treatment of drilling degrees of freedom is used. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.subject Finite element formulation en
dc.subject Topology optimisation en
dc.subject Simple isotropic material with penalization en
dc.subject SIMP en
dc.subject Membrane elements en
dc.subject Shells en
dc.subject Mindlin–Reissner-based element en
dc.subject Discrete Kirchhoff quadrilateral (DKQ) element en
dc.title Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Long, C. S., Loveday, P. W., & Groenwold, A. (2009). Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Long, Craig S, Philip W Loveday, and AA Groenwold "Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Long CS, Loveday PW, Groenwold A. Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Long, Craig S AU - Loveday, Philip W AU - Groenwold, AA AB - The effects of selected membrane, plate and flat shell finite element formulations on optimal topologies are numerically investigated. Two different membrane components are considered. The first is a standard 4-node bilinear quadrilateral, and the other is a 4-node element accounting for in-plane (drilling) rotations. Plate elements selected for evaluation include the discrete Kirchhoff quadrilateral (DKQ) element and two Mindlin–Reissner-based elements, one employing selective reduced integration (SRI), and the other an assumed natural strain (ANS) formulation. The effect of hourglass control on SRI elements is also evaluated. The flat shell elements consist of an assemblage of these membrane and plate components. The Mindlin–Reissner elements are shown to recover the thin plate result computed using DKQ elements. However, optimal topology is shown to be dependent on plate element formulation as thickness increases. Furthermore, a new benchmark problem is introduced illustrating the deficiencies of Mindlin–Reissner elements employing SRI without hourglass control. For shell problems, elements which properly account for in-plane rotations are shown to be insensitive to the penalty parameter which enforces the relationship between in-plane rotations and displacements, in contrast to the situation when an ad hoc treatment of drilling degrees of freedom is used. DA - 2009-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Finite element formulation KW - Topology optimisation KW - Simple isotropic material with penalization KW - SIMP KW - Membrane elements KW - Shells KW - Mindlin–Reissner-based element KW - Discrete Kirchhoff quadrilateral (DKQ) element LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 SM - 0168-874X T1 - Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies TI - Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record