ResearchSpace

Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kishore, P
dc.contributor.author Namboothiri, SP
dc.contributor.author Jiang, JH
dc.contributor.author Sivakumar, V
dc.contributor.author Igarashi, K
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-26T12:46:54Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-26T12:46:54Z
dc.date.issued 2009-02-04
dc.identifier.citation Kishore, P, Namboothiri, SP, Folkins, I et al. 2009. Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol 9(3), pp 897-908. en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3080
dc.description Coypright: 2009 Copernicus Publications en
dc.description.abstract This paper mainly focuses on the validation of temperature estimates derived with the newly launched Constellation Observing System for Meteorology Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC)/Formosa Satellite 3 (FORMOSAT-3) system. The analysis is based on the radio occultation (RO) data sample collected during the first year observation from April 2006 to April 2007. For the validation, the authors have used the operational stratospheric analyses (models) including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction - Reanalysis (NCEP-Reanalysis), the Japanese 25-year Reanalysis (JRA-25), and the United Kingdom Met Office (MetO) data sets. Comparisons done in different formats reveal excellent agreement between the COSMIC and model outputs. Spatially, the largest deviations are noted in the polar latitudes, and height-wise, the tropical tropopause region noted the maximum differences. However, these differences are only 2-4 K. The authors found that among the three models the NCEP data sets have the best resemblance with the COSMIC measurements. The authors also did comparison of specific humidity and refractivity profiles with other measurements/models. Specific humidity profiles show comparatively large differences at altitudes below 5 km. Refractivity profiles derived by the COSMIC and other datasets show very good agreement en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Copernicus Publications en
dc.subject Temperature estimates en
dc.subject Troposphere en
dc.subject Stratosphere en
dc.subject Constellation observing system for meteorology Ionosphere and climate en
dc.subject COSMIC en
dc.title Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Kishore, P., Namboothiri, S., Jiang, J., Sivakumar, V., & Igarashi, K. (2009). Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3080 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Kishore, P, SP Namboothiri, JH Jiang, V Sivakumar, and K Igarashi "Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3080 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Kishore P, Namboothiri S, Jiang J, Sivakumar V, Igarashi K. Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3080. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Kishore, P AU - Namboothiri, SP AU - Jiang, JH AU - Sivakumar, V AU - Igarashi, K AB - This paper mainly focuses on the validation of temperature estimates derived with the newly launched Constellation Observing System for Meteorology Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC)/Formosa Satellite 3 (FORMOSAT-3) system. The analysis is based on the radio occultation (RO) data sample collected during the first year observation from April 2006 to April 2007. For the validation, the authors have used the operational stratospheric analyses (models) including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction - Reanalysis (NCEP-Reanalysis), the Japanese 25-year Reanalysis (JRA-25), and the United Kingdom Met Office (MetO) data sets. Comparisons done in different formats reveal excellent agreement between the COSMIC and model outputs. Spatially, the largest deviations are noted in the polar latitudes, and height-wise, the tropical tropopause region noted the maximum differences. However, these differences are only 2-4 K. The authors found that among the three models the NCEP data sets have the best resemblance with the COSMIC measurements. The authors also did comparison of specific humidity and refractivity profiles with other measurements/models. Specific humidity profiles show comparatively large differences at altitudes below 5 km. Refractivity profiles derived by the COSMIC and other datasets show very good agreement DA - 2009-02-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Temperature estimates KW - Troposphere KW - Stratosphere KW - Constellation observing system for meteorology Ionosphere and climate KW - COSMIC LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 T1 - Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements TI - Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3080 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record