ResearchSpace

Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wepener, V en_US
dc.contributor.author Van Vuren, JHJ en_US
dc.contributor.author Chatiza, FP en_US
dc.contributor.author Mbizi, Z en_US
dc.contributor.author Slabbert, L en_US
dc.contributor.author Masola, B en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-02-06T13:53:21Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-06-07T10:03:51Z
dc.date.available 2007-02-06T13:53:21Z en_US
dc.date.available 2007-06-07T10:03:51Z
dc.date.issued 2005 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Wepener, V, et al. 2005. Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol 30, 16 November, pp 751-761 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1474-7065 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562
dc.description.abstract This paper presents results from a field study in the Rietvlei Wetland system, Gauteng, South Africa using the freshwater mollusk and freshwater fish as bioindicator organisms. Active biomonitoring (ABM) exposures were conducted where organisms were exposed for 28 days in an effluent dominated river during high flow conditions. The river receives effluent from a wastewater treatment plant and an industrial complex, so that up to 75%, of the total flow of the river is effluent-based. Effluents are a main source of direct and continuous input of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems; the study of the effects of effluent exposure on organisms has a high ecological relevance. However due to the unknown and complex nature of effluents it is virtually impossible to relate observed effects to specific pollutants or even a class of pollutants. Effects of field exposure were determined using cellular biomarkers for example DNA damage, HSP 70, metallothionein, acetylcholine esterase, lactate dehydrogenase and ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity. The results indicated that although the traditional mortality-based whole effluent toxicity testing did not designate any toxicity, the in situ exposed organisms were stressed. A multivariate statistical approach was particularly useful for integrating the biomarker responses and highlighting sites at which more detailed analysis of chemical contamination would be useful. Based on the individual biomarker results contributing towards the distinct groupings it is possible to conclude that Site I is subjected to organic pollutants, whereas Sites 2 and 3 undergo a combination of metallic and organic pollutant stress. However, it is essential that a rapid and sensitive biomarker that is representative of the responses of a suite of biomarkers be tested before ABM can be implemented as a routine biomonitoring practice in water resource management. en_US
dc.format.extent 286247 bytes en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.rights Copyright: 2005 Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.subject Rietvlei wetlands - South Africa en_US
dc.subject ABM en_US
dc.subject Active biomonitoring en_US
dc.subject WET en_US
dc.subject Whole effluent toxicity en_US
dc.subject Multivariate statistical analysis en_US
dc.subject Biomarkers en_US
dc.subject Atmospheric sciences en_US
dc.title Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Wepener, V., Van Vuren, J., Chatiza, F., Mbizi, Z., Slabbert, L., & Masola, B. (2005). Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Wepener, V, JHJ Van Vuren, FP Chatiza, Z Mbizi, L Slabbert, and B Masola "Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants." (2005) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Wepener V, Van Vuren J, Chatiza F, Mbizi Z, Slabbert L, Masola B. Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants. 2005; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Wepener, V AU - Van Vuren, JHJ AU - Chatiza, FP AU - Mbizi, Z AU - Slabbert, L AU - Masola, B AB - This paper presents results from a field study in the Rietvlei Wetland system, Gauteng, South Africa using the freshwater mollusk and freshwater fish as bioindicator organisms. Active biomonitoring (ABM) exposures were conducted where organisms were exposed for 28 days in an effluent dominated river during high flow conditions. The river receives effluent from a wastewater treatment plant and an industrial complex, so that up to 75%, of the total flow of the river is effluent-based. Effluents are a main source of direct and continuous input of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems; the study of the effects of effluent exposure on organisms has a high ecological relevance. However due to the unknown and complex nature of effluents it is virtually impossible to relate observed effects to specific pollutants or even a class of pollutants. Effects of field exposure were determined using cellular biomarkers for example DNA damage, HSP 70, metallothionein, acetylcholine esterase, lactate dehydrogenase and ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity. The results indicated that although the traditional mortality-based whole effluent toxicity testing did not designate any toxicity, the in situ exposed organisms were stressed. A multivariate statistical approach was particularly useful for integrating the biomarker responses and highlighting sites at which more detailed analysis of chemical contamination would be useful. Based on the individual biomarker results contributing towards the distinct groupings it is possible to conclude that Site I is subjected to organic pollutants, whereas Sites 2 and 3 undergo a combination of metallic and organic pollutant stress. However, it is essential that a rapid and sensitive biomarker that is representative of the responses of a suite of biomarkers be tested before ABM can be implemented as a routine biomonitoring practice in water resource management. DA - 2005 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Rietvlei wetlands - South Africa KW - ABM KW - Active biomonitoring KW - WET KW - Whole effluent toxicity KW - Multivariate statistical analysis KW - Biomarkers KW - Atmospheric sciences LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2005 SM - 1474-7065 T1 - Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants TI - Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1562 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record