ResearchSpace

A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Stafford, William HL
dc.contributor.author Russo, Valentina
dc.contributor.author Nahman, Anton
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-02T08:02:30Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-02T08:02:30Z
dc.date.issued 2022-09
dc.identifier.citation Stafford, W.H., Russo, V. & Nahman, N. 2022. A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa. <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0948-3349
dc.identifier.issn 1614-7502
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02085-2
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549
dc.description.abstract The pervasive use of plastics, coupled with inadequate waste management systems in many countries, has led to widespread leakage of plastics into the environment. In South Africa, the predominant type of shopping bags are single-use plastic bags; but paper, biodegradable plastic and re-usable bags have emerged as alternatives. To compare these alternatives in terms of environmental impacts across the whole product life cycle, we carried out a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of 16 shopping bag types available in South Africa. The comparison includes single-use plastic, bioplastic and paper bags, as well as re-usable bags (typically made from plastic in South Africa). The functional unit was based on the estimated annual volume of groceries purchased per capita. An attributional LCA was carried out using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint(H) method, with 18 mid-point impact categories. In addition, given the lack of an impact category for plastic pollution in existing methods, we developed a mid-point indicator based on the persistence of plastics (and other materials) leaked to the environment (Persistence of leaked material, PersistenceLM). Specific attention was placed on modelling end-of-life and waste management in the South African context. Economic-based allocation at the point of substitution was used to apportion environmental impacts to virgin and recyclate material, and the production of recyclate was modelled using system expansion. en_US
dc.format Abstract en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-022-02085-2 en_US
dc.relation.uri https://rdcu.be/c0QGV en_US
dc.source The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27 en_US
dc.subject Bioplastic en_US
dc.subject Carrier bag en_US
dc.subject Life Cycle Assessment en_US
dc.subject Paper en_US
dc.subject Plastic pollution en_US
dc.subject Plastic en_US
dc.subject Shopping en_US
dc.title A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 1213-1227 en_US
dc.description.note © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02085-2. A free read-only version of the article can be viewed via https://rdcu.be/c0QGV en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea Sustainable Econs and Waste en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Stafford, W. H., Russo, V., & Nahman, N. (2022). A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa. <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Stafford, William H, Valentina Russo, and Nagman Nahman "A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa." <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Stafford WH, Russo V, Nahman N. A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Stafford, William H AU - Russo, Valentina AU - Nahman, Nagman AB - The pervasive use of plastics, coupled with inadequate waste management systems in many countries, has led to widespread leakage of plastics into the environment. In South Africa, the predominant type of shopping bags are single-use plastic bags; but paper, biodegradable plastic and re-usable bags have emerged as alternatives. To compare these alternatives in terms of environmental impacts across the whole product life cycle, we carried out a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of 16 shopping bag types available in South Africa. The comparison includes single-use plastic, bioplastic and paper bags, as well as re-usable bags (typically made from plastic in South Africa). The functional unit was based on the estimated annual volume of groceries purchased per capita. An attributional LCA was carried out using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint(H) method, with 18 mid-point impact categories. In addition, given the lack of an impact category for plastic pollution in existing methods, we developed a mid-point indicator based on the persistence of plastics (and other materials) leaked to the environment (Persistence of leaked material, PersistenceLM). Specific attention was placed on modelling end-of-life and waste management in the South African context. Economic-based allocation at the point of substitution was used to apportion environmental impacts to virgin and recyclate material, and the production of recyclate was modelled using system expansion. DA - 2022-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27 KW - Bioplastic KW - Carrier bag KW - Life Cycle Assessment KW - Paper KW - Plastic pollution KW - Plastic KW - Shopping LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2022 SM - 0948-3349 SM - 1614-7502 T1 - A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa TI - A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12549 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 26033 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record