ResearchSpace

Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cebekhulu, Eric
dc.contributor.author Onumanyi, Adeiza J
dc.contributor.author Isaac, Sherrin J
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-29T10:08:29Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-29T10:08:29Z
dc.date.issued 2022-02
dc.identifier.citation Cebekhulu, E., Onumanyi, A.J. & Isaac, S.J. 2022. Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids. <i>Sustainability, 14(5).</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052546
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431
dc.description.abstract The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms for power demand and supply prediction is becoming increasingly popular in smart grid systems. Due to the fact that there exist many simple ML algorithms/models in the literature, the question arises as to whether there is any significant advantage(s) among these different ML algorithms, particularly as it pertains to power demand/supply prediction use cases. Toward answering this question, we examined six well-known ML algorithms for power prediction in smart grid systems, including the artificial neural network, Gaussian regression (GR), k-nearest neighbor, linear regression, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM). First, fairness was ensured by undertaking a thorough hyperparameter tuning exercise of the models under consideration. As a second step, power demand and supply statistics from the Eskom database were selected for day-ahead forecasting purposes. These datasets were based on system hourly demand as well as renewable generation sources. Hence, when their hyperparameters were properly tuned, the results obtained within the boundaries of the datasets utilized showed that there was little/no significant difference in the quantitative and qualitative performance of the different ML algorithms. As compared to photovoltaic (PV) power generation, we observed that these algorithms performed poorly in predicting wind power output. This could be related to the unpredictable wind-generated power obtained within the time range of the datasets employed. Furthermore, while the SVM algorithm achieved the slightly quickest empirical processing time, statistical tests revealed that there was no significant difference in the timing performance of the various algorithms, except for the GR algorithm. As a result, our preliminary findings suggest that using a variety of existing ML algorithms for power demand/supply prediction may not always yield statistically significant comparative prediction results, particularly for sources with regular patterns, such as solar PV or daily consumption rates, provided that the hyperparameters of such algorithms are properly fine tuned. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2546 en_US
dc.source Sustainability, 14(5) en_US
dc.subject Eskom en_US
dc.subject Machine learning en_US
dc.subject ML en_US
dc.subject ML algorithms en_US
dc.subject Hyperparameters en_US
dc.subject Smart grid systems en_US
dc.subject Fine tuned hyperparameters en_US
dc.title Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 26 en_US
dc.description.note Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). en_US
dc.description.cluster Defence and Security en_US
dc.description.cluster Next Generation Enterprises & Institutions en_US
dc.description.impactarea Inf and Cybersecurity Centre en_US
dc.description.impactarea Advanced Internet of Things en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Cebekhulu, E., Onumanyi, A. J., & Isaac, S. J. (2022). Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids. <i>Sustainability, 14(5)</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Cebekhulu, Eric, Adeiza J Onumanyi, and Sherrin J Isaac "Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids." <i>Sustainability, 14(5)</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Cebekhulu E, Onumanyi AJ, Isaac SJ. Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids. Sustainability, 14(5). 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Cebekhulu, Eric AU - Onumanyi, Adeiza J AU - Isaac, Sherrin J AB - The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms for power demand and supply prediction is becoming increasingly popular in smart grid systems. Due to the fact that there exist many simple ML algorithms/models in the literature, the question arises as to whether there is any significant advantage(s) among these different ML algorithms, particularly as it pertains to power demand/supply prediction use cases. Toward answering this question, we examined six well-known ML algorithms for power prediction in smart grid systems, including the artificial neural network, Gaussian regression (GR), k-nearest neighbor, linear regression, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM). First, fairness was ensured by undertaking a thorough hyperparameter tuning exercise of the models under consideration. As a second step, power demand and supply statistics from the Eskom database were selected for day-ahead forecasting purposes. These datasets were based on system hourly demand as well as renewable generation sources. Hence, when their hyperparameters were properly tuned, the results obtained within the boundaries of the datasets utilized showed that there was little/no significant difference in the quantitative and qualitative performance of the different ML algorithms. As compared to photovoltaic (PV) power generation, we observed that these algorithms performed poorly in predicting wind power output. This could be related to the unpredictable wind-generated power obtained within the time range of the datasets employed. Furthermore, while the SVM algorithm achieved the slightly quickest empirical processing time, statistical tests revealed that there was no significant difference in the timing performance of the various algorithms, except for the GR algorithm. As a result, our preliminary findings suggest that using a variety of existing ML algorithms for power demand/supply prediction may not always yield statistically significant comparative prediction results, particularly for sources with regular patterns, such as solar PV or daily consumption rates, provided that the hyperparameters of such algorithms are properly fine tuned. DA - 2022-02 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - Sustainability, 14(5) KW - Eskom KW - Machine learning KW - ML KW - ML algorithms KW - Hyperparameters KW - Smart grid systems KW - Fine tuned hyperparameters LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2022 SM - 2071-1050 T1 - Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids TI - Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for energy demand–supply prediction in smart grids UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12431 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 25669 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record