ResearchSpace

Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rust, FC
dc.contributor.author Van Dijk, G
dc.contributor.author Fourie, HS
dc.contributor.author Smit, Michelle A
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-04T10:03:43Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-04T10:03:43Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.identifier.citation Rust, F., Van Dijk, G., Fourie, H. & Smit, M.A. 2021. Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme. <i>Administratio Publica, 29(4).</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1015-4833
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255
dc.description.abstract Investment in Research and Development (R&D) is scrutinised where funding is limited such as in developing counties. There is therefore an increased emphasis on benefit and impact assessment tools and systems for such R&D programmes. In sectors like roads and transport, deliverables from R&D could include new materials and equipment. However, it usually, and more often, delivers novel design methods, new techniques and models for enhancing transport system performance and free software for use by professionals in the industry. The nature of these “soft” deliverables complicates the measurement of the performance of R&D in roads and transport. The South African Roads Agency Ltd SOC (SANRAL) developed a Balanced Score Card (BSC) with associated indicators that can be used to monitor the performance of its research programme across the full innovation value chain. This article aims to review the indicator set by assessing its balance in terms of SANRAL’s systems-based R&D model, by evaluating it against the SANRAL strategic objectives and through a survey among 175 stakeholders and researchers. It was found that the indicator set is well balanced and addresses all aspects of the innovation value chain. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://journal.assadpam.net/index.php?journal=assadpam&page=issue&op=viewIssue&path%5B%5D=53&path%5B%5D=47 en_US
dc.source Administratio Publica, 29(4) en_US
dc.subject The South African Roads Agency Ltd en_US
dc.subject SANRAL en_US
dc.subject Balanced Score Card en_US
dc.subject BSC en_US
dc.title Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 33-54 en_US
dc.description.note Article published in Administratio Publica, 29(4): 33-54 en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Mobility en_US
dc.description.impactarea Pavement Design and Construction en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Rust, F., Van Dijk, G., Fourie, H., & Smit, M. A. (2021). Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme. <i>Administratio Publica, 29(4)</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Rust, FC, G Van Dijk, HS Fourie, and Michelle A Smit "Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme." <i>Administratio Publica, 29(4)</i> (2021) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Rust F, Van Dijk G, Fourie H, Smit MA. Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme. Administratio Publica, 29(4). 2021; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Rust, FC AU - Van Dijk, G AU - Fourie, HS AU - Smit, Michelle A AB - Investment in Research and Development (R&D) is scrutinised where funding is limited such as in developing counties. There is therefore an increased emphasis on benefit and impact assessment tools and systems for such R&D programmes. In sectors like roads and transport, deliverables from R&D could include new materials and equipment. However, it usually, and more often, delivers novel design methods, new techniques and models for enhancing transport system performance and free software for use by professionals in the industry. The nature of these “soft” deliverables complicates the measurement of the performance of R&D in roads and transport. The South African Roads Agency Ltd SOC (SANRAL) developed a Balanced Score Card (BSC) with associated indicators that can be used to monitor the performance of its research programme across the full innovation value chain. This article aims to review the indicator set by assessing its balance in terms of SANRAL’s systems-based R&D model, by evaluating it against the SANRAL strategic objectives and through a survey among 175 stakeholders and researchers. It was found that the indicator set is well balanced and addresses all aspects of the innovation value chain. DA - 2021-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - Administratio Publica, 29(4) KW - The South African Roads Agency Ltd KW - SANRAL KW - Balanced Score Card KW - BSC LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2021 SM - 1015-4833 T1 - Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme TI - Validating a balanced score card benefit assessment framework indicator set: The case of the South African National Roads Agency Ltd SOC research and development programme UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12255 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 25308 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record