ResearchSpace

Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Russo, Valentina
dc.contributor.author Strever, AE
dc.contributor.author Ponstein, HJ
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-25T17:44:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-25T17:44:58Z
dc.date.issued 2021-04
dc.identifier.citation Russo, V., Strever, A. & Ponstein, H. 2021. Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa. <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0948-3349
dc.identifier.issn 1614-7502
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021
dc.description.abstract Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the frst life cycle assessment of diferent wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse efects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight diferent scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidifcation, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that afected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly afected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnifed by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, defcit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO2 emissions embodied in products. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3 en_US
dc.source The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225 en_US
dc.subject Life Cycle Assessment en_US
dc.subject LCA en_US
dc.subject Wine grapes en_US
dc.subject Water footprint en_US
dc.subject Carbon footprint en_US
dc.subject Irrigation en_US
dc.subject Scenario analysis en_US
dc.title Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 17 en_US
dc.description.note Copyright: 2021 The Author(s). en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea Waste Benefication en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Russo, V., Strever, A., & Ponstein, H. (2021). Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa. <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Russo, Valentina, AE Strever, and HJ Ponstein "Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa." <i>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225</i> (2021) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Russo V, Strever A, Ponstein H. Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225. 2021; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Russo, Valentina AU - Strever, AE AU - Ponstein, HJ AB - Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the frst life cycle assessment of diferent wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse efects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight diferent scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidifcation, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that afected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly afected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnifed by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, defcit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO2 emissions embodied in products. DA - 2021-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 225 KW - Life Cycle Assessment KW - LCA KW - Wine grapes KW - Water footprint KW - Carbon footprint KW - Irrigation KW - Scenario analysis LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2021 SM - 0948-3349 SM - 1614-7502 T1 - Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa TI - Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12021 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 24531 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record