dc.contributor.author |
Motheeram, Preia
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Herselman, Martha E
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Botha, Adèle
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-09-14T18:39:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-09-14T18:39:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-03 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Motheeram, P., Herselman, M.E. & Botha, A. 2018. A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments. Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, vol. 14, no. 1: DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i1.463 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2415-2005 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1817-4434 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/463
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i1.463
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/463/670
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11578
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright 2018 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This article presents a scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems. A scoping review can be seen as a methodology for systematically assessing the breadth of available research literature. This article is aimed at identifying the nature, extent and current understanding of digital open badge ecosystems. Scoping reviews follow many of the same methodological steps as systematic reviews where the reliability of results and the potential for replication remain essential. As such, this review follows the eight steps outlined by Okoli and Schabram. From the 1608 studies identified, 41 were considered relevant for inclusion criteria and thus included in a final sample. Some relevant websites and the so-called grey literature were included. These were evaluated according to the inclusion criteria and were categorised. Further subcategories were identified which include the notion of digital badges (n = 35) and open digital badges (n = 18), elements of a digital open badge ecosystem (n = 27) and reported implementations (n = 29). The scoping review presents a literature repository that can be used by practitioners and researchers interested in the application of digital open badges for the establishment of a digital open badge ecosystem. The review also serves to highlight the potential benefits this can have for resource-constrained environments. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
AOSIS |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;20640 |
|
dc.subject |
Digital open badge |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ecosystem |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Digital badges |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Digital badges |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Scopung review |
en_US |
dc.title |
A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Motheeram, P., Herselman, M. E., & Botha, A. (2018). A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11578 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Motheeram, Preia, Martha E Herselman, and Adèle Botha "A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments." (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11578 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Motheeram P, Herselman ME, Botha A. A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments. 2018; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11578. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Motheeram, Preia
AU - Herselman, Martha E
AU - Botha, Adèle
AB - This article presents a scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems. A scoping review can be seen as a methodology for systematically assessing the breadth of available research literature. This article is aimed at identifying the nature, extent and current understanding of digital open badge ecosystems. Scoping reviews follow many of the same methodological steps as systematic reviews where the reliability of results and the potential for replication remain essential. As such, this review follows the eight steps outlined by Okoli and Schabram. From the 1608 studies identified, 41 were considered relevant for inclusion criteria and thus included in a final sample. Some relevant websites and the so-called grey literature were included. These were evaluated according to the inclusion criteria and were categorised. Further subcategories were identified which include the notion of digital badges (n = 35) and open digital badges (n = 18), elements of a digital open badge ecosystem (n = 27) and reported implementations (n = 29). The scoping review presents a literature repository that can be used by practitioners and researchers interested in the application of digital open badges for the establishment of a digital open badge ecosystem. The review also serves to highlight the potential benefits this can have for resource-constrained environments.
DA - 2018-03
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Digital open badge
KW - Ecosystem
KW - Digital badges
KW - Digital badges
KW - Scopung review
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2018
SM - 2415-2005
SM - 1817-4434
T1 - A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments
TI - A scoping review of digital open badge ecosystems in relation to resource-constrained environments
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11578
ER -
|
en_ZA |