ResearchSpace

Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Deksissa, T
dc.contributor.author Ashton, PJ
dc.contributor.author Vanrolleghem, PA
dc.date.accessioned 2007-08-06T10:13:58Z
dc.date.available 2007-08-06T10:13:58Z
dc.date.issued 2003-03
dc.identifier.citation Deksissa, T, Ashton, PJ and Vanrolleghem, PA. 2003. Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa). Water SA, Vol. 29(2), pp 209-217 en
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1091
dc.description Copyright: 2003 Water Research Commission en
dc.description.abstract Using a simple conceptual dynamic river water quality model, the effects of different basin-wide water quality management options on downstream water quality improvements in a semi-arid river, the Crocodile River (South Africa) were investigated. When a river is impacted by high rates of freshwater withdrawal (in its upstream reaches), and receives polluted side-stream inflows and wastewater effluent discharges (in the middle reaches), river water quality can deteriorate seriously over time. This study focusedon two water quality problems: Progressive increases in the concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) as a measure of salinity, and the concentrations of nitrate-plus-nitrite and ammonia (as inorganic nitrogen) as a measure of eutrophication. Based on a low flow analysis for the period prior to construction of the Kwena Dam (1960 to 1979), the 7d low flows that could be expected to occur every 10 years (7Q10) are generally very low (< 0.5 m3•s-1), both in the upstream (Montrose Weir) and the downstream (Kruger National Park) sections of the Crocodile River. During such critical periods of low river flow, very low effluent standard limits would be required to prevent adverse river water quality. However, these options are not economically feasible. Furthermore,inflows from the highly polluted tributary stream, the Kaap River, which drains an area where considerable gold mining takes place, govern water quality in the Crocodile River downstream of the Crocodile-Kaap confluence. Subsequently, two additional water quality control options (setting limits for maximum water withdrawal and low-flow augmentation) were analysed. The results show that a decrease in maximum water withdrawal could reduce the TDS concentration. Furthermore, controlling water release patterns from a dam at the Montrose Weir can have a remarkably positive effect on the downstream river water quality. On the basis of the 1989/90 monitoring data, a minimum flow of 5 m3•s-1 at the Montrose Weir can reduce concentrations of TDS and ammonia nitrogen by about 20% and 60%, respectively, in the Kruger National Park (at the downstream point of the considered river).However, this management option does not reduce nitrate nitrogen concentrations. The proposed model used in this study is relatively simple and can be used as a tool for the evaluation of short-term (monthly) basin-wide water quality management options. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en
dc.subject Dynamic model en
dc.subject Flow regulation en
dc.subject Water quality management en
dc.subject tank in series model en
dc.title Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa) en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Deksissa, T., Ashton, P., & Vanrolleghem, P. (2003). Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa). http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1091 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Deksissa, T, PJ Ashton, and PA Vanrolleghem "Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa)." (2003) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1091 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Deksissa T, Ashton P, Vanrolleghem P. Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa). 2003; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1091. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Deksissa, T AU - Ashton, PJ AU - Vanrolleghem, PA AB - Using a simple conceptual dynamic river water quality model, the effects of different basin-wide water quality management options on downstream water quality improvements in a semi-arid river, the Crocodile River (South Africa) were investigated. When a river is impacted by high rates of freshwater withdrawal (in its upstream reaches), and receives polluted side-stream inflows and wastewater effluent discharges (in the middle reaches), river water quality can deteriorate seriously over time. This study focusedon two water quality problems: Progressive increases in the concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) as a measure of salinity, and the concentrations of nitrate-plus-nitrite and ammonia (as inorganic nitrogen) as a measure of eutrophication. Based on a low flow analysis for the period prior to construction of the Kwena Dam (1960 to 1979), the 7d low flows that could be expected to occur every 10 years (7Q10) are generally very low (< 0.5 m3•s-1), both in the upstream (Montrose Weir) and the downstream (Kruger National Park) sections of the Crocodile River. During such critical periods of low river flow, very low effluent standard limits would be required to prevent adverse river water quality. However, these options are not economically feasible. Furthermore,inflows from the highly polluted tributary stream, the Kaap River, which drains an area where considerable gold mining takes place, govern water quality in the Crocodile River downstream of the Crocodile-Kaap confluence. Subsequently, two additional water quality control options (setting limits for maximum water withdrawal and low-flow augmentation) were analysed. The results show that a decrease in maximum water withdrawal could reduce the TDS concentration. Furthermore, controlling water release patterns from a dam at the Montrose Weir can have a remarkably positive effect on the downstream river water quality. On the basis of the 1989/90 monitoring data, a minimum flow of 5 m3•s-1 at the Montrose Weir can reduce concentrations of TDS and ammonia nitrogen by about 20% and 60%, respectively, in the Kruger National Park (at the downstream point of the considered river).However, this management option does not reduce nitrate nitrogen concentrations. The proposed model used in this study is relatively simple and can be used as a tool for the evaluation of short-term (monthly) basin-wide water quality management options. DA - 2003-03 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Dynamic model KW - Flow regulation KW - Water quality management KW - tank in series model LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2003 SM - 0378-4738 T1 - Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa) TI - Control options for river water improvement: a case study of TDS and inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile river (South Africa) UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1091 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record