Van Wyk, Llewellyn V2018-05-232018-05-232015-12Van Wyk, L. 2015. The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus. The Green Building Handbook South Africa Volume 9: Materials and Technologies. p. 36-549-780620-452403https://issuu.com/alive2green/docs/gb-mat__tech_/15https://issuu.com/alive2green/docs/gb-mat__tech_http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10227The attached pdf contains an abstract of the fulltext item. The fulltext item can be viewed free of charge at https://issuu.com/alive2green/docs/gb-mat__tech_/15. Alternatively, kindly contact the publishers to obtain a copy of the chapter.Human settlements historically conjure up contradictory images (think Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities): one is that of the dynamic, cosmopolitan centre of business, culture and entertainment with lively, diverse and socially inclusive neighbourhoods, home to many millions of people. The other image is more ominous: dilapidation, degradation, crime, dangerous streets, poverty, pollution, and social exclusion, again ‘home’ for many millions. Both images are partial reflections of South Africa’s human settlements: “coming to terms with our cities [and settlements] in all their complexity is a key challenge for the development of effective public policy” aimed at advancing sustainable human settlements (Policy Research Initiative 2002:1). Increasingly calls are made for science to be integrated into policy development under the banner of ‘science for policy’ or ‘evidence-based policy’ (EBP) although it is argued that the importance of understanding and using science for public policy-making has long been recognised (as in the Rothschild Report of 1971) and that relevant policies should take into account both scientific knowledge and the needs of science (Head 2009:17). Sutherland, Bellingan, Bellingham, Blackstock, Bloomfield, et al (2012) argue that EBP has become the norm in many fields and that many governments engage scientists at a senior level. Advocates of EBP suggest that EBP was first suggested in the UK in the 1999 White Paper on Modernising Government where it states “This Government expects more of policy makers. More new ideas, more willingness to question inherited ways of doing things, better use of evidence and research in policy making and better focus on policies that will deliver long term goals”. The ESRC also notes that there is a renewed focus in commissioning research that assists not only in understanding a problem but offers some guidance to make it better (ESRC 2001:4; Head 2009:16). More recently members of the Scientific Advisory Board of the UN Secretary-General stressed that “science is the key to a sustainable future” and that the “interface between science and policy must be improved in order to develop and implement these solutions effectively” (UNESCO 2015).enHuman settlementsThe Green Building Handbook SA Volume 9: Materials and TechnologiesSustainable industriesThe science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexusBook ChapterVan Wyk, L. V. (2015). The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus., <i>Worklist;16586</i> Alive2green. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10227Van Wyk, Llewellyn V. "The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus" In <i>WORKLIST;16586</i>, n.p.: Alive2green. 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10227.Van Wyk LV. The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus.. Worklist;16586. [place unknown]: Alive2green; 2015. [cited yyyy month dd]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10227.TY - Book Chapter AU - Van Wyk, Llewellyn V AB - Human settlements historically conjure up contradictory images (think Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities): one is that of the dynamic, cosmopolitan centre of business, culture and entertainment with lively, diverse and socially inclusive neighbourhoods, home to many millions of people. The other image is more ominous: dilapidation, degradation, crime, dangerous streets, poverty, pollution, and social exclusion, again ‘home’ for many millions. Both images are partial reflections of South Africa’s human settlements: “coming to terms with our cities [and settlements] in all their complexity is a key challenge for the development of effective public policy” aimed at advancing sustainable human settlements (Policy Research Initiative 2002:1). Increasingly calls are made for science to be integrated into policy development under the banner of ‘science for policy’ or ‘evidence-based policy’ (EBP) although it is argued that the importance of understanding and using science for public policy-making has long been recognised (as in the Rothschild Report of 1971) and that relevant policies should take into account both scientific knowledge and the needs of science (Head 2009:17). Sutherland, Bellingan, Bellingham, Blackstock, Bloomfield, et al (2012) argue that EBP has become the norm in many fields and that many governments engage scientists at a senior level. Advocates of EBP suggest that EBP was first suggested in the UK in the 1999 White Paper on Modernising Government where it states “This Government expects more of policy makers. More new ideas, more willingness to question inherited ways of doing things, better use of evidence and research in policy making and better focus on policies that will deliver long term goals”. The ESRC also notes that there is a renewed focus in commissioning research that assists not only in understanding a problem but offers some guidance to make it better (ESRC 2001:4; Head 2009:16). More recently members of the Scientific Advisory Board of the UN Secretary-General stressed that “science is the key to a sustainable future” and that the “interface between science and policy must be improved in order to develop and implement these solutions effectively” (UNESCO 2015). DA - 2015-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Human settlements KW - The Green Building Handbook SA Volume 9: Materials and Technologies KW - Sustainable industries LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 9-780620-452403 T1 - The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus TI - The science, technology and innovation/sustainability nexus UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10227 ER -