Herselman, Martha EBotha, AdèleFogwill, ThomasAlberts, Ronell2017-05-172017-05-172016-12Herselman, M., Botha, A., Fogwill, T. and Alberts, R. 2016. Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania. In: Herselman, M and Botha, A. 2016. Strategies, Approaches and Experiences: Towards building a South African Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem. CSIR Meraka, Pretoria978-0-7988-5632-4https://rehealthafrica.com/towards-building-south-african-digital-health-innovation-ecosystem/http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101Chapter in: Strategies, Approaches and Experiences: Towards building a South African Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. It is attributed to Prof Marlien Herselman and Prof Adèle Botha from CSIR, Meraka & UNISA, School of Computing.This part deals with the last phase of the DSRM process. It is essential to understand the limitations of the transfer of Finnish or European experience and technical solutions to South Africa. The specification and definition of potential South African users and beneficiaries of digital health systems, or the adaptation of the cost structure of solutions would probably be the traditional focus areas when considering the value of European examples for South Africa. Indeed, failure to appreciate the local context and user needs is a typical problem when people attempt to transfer solutions from Europe to Africa. However, learning from other countries at the system level requires that attention be paid to how the emerging South African Digital Health System is adapted, integrated and coordinated with South Africa’s national innovation system.enDigital Health Innovation EcosystemDHIEFinnish technological transfersEuropean technological transfersPhase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and TanzaniaKey findings from workshops in South Africa and TanzaniaBook ChapterHerselman, M. E., Botha, A., Fogwill, T., & Alberts, R. (2016). Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania., <i>Worklist;18092</i> CSIR. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101Herselman, Martha E, Adèle Botha, Thomas Fogwill, and Ronell Alberts. "Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania" In <i>WORKLIST;18092</i>, n.p.: CSIR. 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101.Herselman ME, Botha A, Fogwill T, Alberts R. Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania.. Worklist;18092. [place unknown]: CSIR; 2016. [cited yyyy month dd]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101.TY - Book Chapter AU - Herselman, Martha E AU - Botha, Adèle AU - Fogwill, Thomas AU - Alberts, Ronell AB - This part deals with the last phase of the DSRM process. It is essential to understand the limitations of the transfer of Finnish or European experience and technical solutions to South Africa. The specification and definition of potential South African users and beneficiaries of digital health systems, or the adaptation of the cost structure of solutions would probably be the traditional focus areas when considering the value of European examples for South Africa. Indeed, failure to appreciate the local context and user needs is a typical problem when people attempt to transfer solutions from Europe to Africa. However, learning from other countries at the system level requires that attention be paid to how the emerging South African Digital Health System is adapted, integrated and coordinated with South Africa’s national innovation system. DA - 2016-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem KW - DHIE KW - Finnish technological transfers KW - European technological transfers LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2016 SM - 978-0-7988-5632-4 T1 - Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania TI - Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania T2 - Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101 ER -