Baumbach, J2009-02-182009-02-182008-10Baumbach, J. 2008. Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures. Land Warfare Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 27 - 31 October 2008, pp 29-340642705585http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029Land Warfare Conference 2008The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) are pairwise comparison methods. A large number of observers need to perform an LCJ evaluation in order to get accurate results. LCJ also does not provide an absolute scale of performance, nor does it provide a metric to evaluate the accuracy of the evaluation. Abovementioned shortcomings were addressed using AHPenAnalytical hierarchy processLaw of comparative judgementLCJAHPTarget signaturesConference PresentationBaumbach, J. (2008). Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029Baumbach, J. "Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures." (2008): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029Baumbach J, Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 .TY - Conference Presentation AU - Baumbach, J AB - The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) are pairwise comparison methods. A large number of observers need to perform an LCJ evaluation in order to get accurate results. LCJ also does not provide an absolute scale of performance, nor does it provide a metric to evaluate the accuracy of the evaluation. Abovementioned shortcomings were addressed using AHP DA - 2008-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Analytical hierarchy process KW - Law of comparative judgement KW - LCJ KW - AHP KW - Target signatures LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2008 SM - 0642705585 T1 - Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures TI - Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 ER -