Moodley, KMeyer, TVarzinczak, IJ2012-01-102012-01-102011-08Moodley, K, Meyer, T and Varzinczak, IJ. 2011. Root justifications for ontology repair. 5th International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, Galway, Ireland, 29-30 August 2011http://hdl.handle.net/10204/54655th International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, Galway, Ireland, 29-30 August 2011In recent years, there has been significant progress in developing tools for debugging and repairing Description Logic (DL)-based ontologies with erroneous consequences. However, these tools place more emphasis on explaining why the consequences follow from the ontology rather than on eliminating them. Another shortcoming in existing tools is that there is no common approach for eliminating or handling different types of erroneous consequences in the ontology. By extending existing principles in ontology repair, the authors goal is to define one such a common approach. They've implemented a Protege plugin to demonstrate our approach and we evaluate it against the traditional ones.enDescription logicDescription logic based ontologiesOntologiesRoot justificationsWeb reasoningRule systemsOntology repairConference PresentationMoodley, K., Meyer, T., & Varzinczak, I. (2011). Root justifications for ontology repair. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5465Moodley, K, T Meyer, and IJ Varzinczak. "Root justifications for ontology repair." (2011): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5465Moodley K, Meyer T, Varzinczak I, Root justifications for ontology repair; 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5465 .TY - Conference Presentation AU - Moodley, K AU - Meyer, T AU - Varzinczak, IJ AB - In recent years, there has been significant progress in developing tools for debugging and repairing Description Logic (DL)-based ontologies with erroneous consequences. However, these tools place more emphasis on explaining why the consequences follow from the ontology rather than on eliminating them. Another shortcoming in existing tools is that there is no common approach for eliminating or handling different types of erroneous consequences in the ontology. By extending existing principles in ontology repair, the authors goal is to define one such a common approach. They've implemented a Protege plugin to demonstrate our approach and we evaluate it against the traditional ones. DA - 2011-08 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Description logic KW - Description logic based ontologies KW - Ontologies KW - Root justifications KW - Web reasoning KW - Rule systems KW - Ontology repair LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2011 T1 - Root justifications for ontology repair TI - Root justifications for ontology repair UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5465 ER -