Kaszta, ZMarino, JRamoelo, AbelWolff, E2016-09-012016-09-012016-03Kaszta, Z, Marino, J, Ramoelo, A and Wolff, E. 2016. Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity. Ecological Modelling, Vol 323, pp. 115–1220304-3800http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015005748http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8746Copyright: 2016 Elsevier. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published in Ecological Modelling, Vol 323, pp. 115–122The distribution and behaviour of African large grazers are regulated primarily from the bottom up, with some species showing clear preferences for certain vegetation types. While the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is sometimes considered a bulk grazer, other studies indicate that they can be selective and show seasonal variations in their home ranges. We used very high resolution satellite imagery to evaluate how the quality and quantity of the vegetation influence space use by buffalo herds in Kruger National Park, testing the bulk-selective hypotheses. Using telemetry data from six buffalo, we analyzed seasonal differences in home ranges and core areas. We investigated resource selection and preference at various spatial scales for a subset of three buffalo, comparing habitat use against vegetation biomass and nitrogen content, derived from a high resolution RapidEye image of the wet season. Overall buffalo preferred open vegetation types, with sparse trees and fertile soils, and had home ranges that partially overlapped between dry and wet seasons (average overlap 50%). Buffalo formed home ranges non-randomly within the study area, choosing vegetation of higher quality and quantity. Within home ranges, however, they selected for higher quality forage, and not for higher quantity. Our results showed that the dichotomy between unselective bulk grazers or selective feeders can be scale dependent, as buffalo behaved more like bulk feeders at the scale of home ranges but were more selective within their home range, preferring quality over quantity.enAfrican buffaloKruger National ParkSpace useRemote sensingResource utilization functionCompositional analysesArticleKaszta, Z., Marino, J., Ramoelo, A., & Wolff, E. (2016). Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8746Kaszta, Z, J Marino, Abel Ramoelo, and E Wolff "Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity." (2016) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8746Kaszta Z, Marino J, Ramoelo A, Wolff E. Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity. 2016; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8746.TY - Article AU - Kaszta, Z AU - Marino, J AU - Ramoelo, Abel AU - Wolff, E AB - The distribution and behaviour of African large grazers are regulated primarily from the bottom up, with some species showing clear preferences for certain vegetation types. While the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is sometimes considered a bulk grazer, other studies indicate that they can be selective and show seasonal variations in their home ranges. We used very high resolution satellite imagery to evaluate how the quality and quantity of the vegetation influence space use by buffalo herds in Kruger National Park, testing the bulk-selective hypotheses. Using telemetry data from six buffalo, we analyzed seasonal differences in home ranges and core areas. We investigated resource selection and preference at various spatial scales for a subset of three buffalo, comparing habitat use against vegetation biomass and nitrogen content, derived from a high resolution RapidEye image of the wet season. Overall buffalo preferred open vegetation types, with sparse trees and fertile soils, and had home ranges that partially overlapped between dry and wet seasons (average overlap 50%). Buffalo formed home ranges non-randomly within the study area, choosing vegetation of higher quality and quantity. Within home ranges, however, they selected for higher quality forage, and not for higher quantity. Our results showed that the dichotomy between unselective bulk grazers or selective feeders can be scale dependent, as buffalo behaved more like bulk feeders at the scale of home ranges but were more selective within their home range, preferring quality over quantity. DA - 2016-03 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - African buffalo KW - Kruger National Park KW - Space use KW - Remote sensing KW - Resource utilization function KW - Compositional analyses LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2016 SM - 0304-3800 T1 - Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity TI - Bulk feeder or selective grazer: African buffalo space use patterns based on fine-scale remotely sensed data on forage quality and quantity UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8746 ER -