García, CLJovanovic, NebojsaTeich, IFink, MDzikiti, SebinasiBugan, Richard DH2020-08-242020-08-242020-04Bugan, R.D.H. (et.al.). 2020. Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. Water SA, v46(2), 158-1700378-47381816-7950DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i2.8231https://www.ajol.info/index.php/wsa/article/view/195935http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555Copyright: 2020 Water Research Commission. This is the full text version of the work.Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes.enEvapotranspirationHydrological modellingRemote sensingEstimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approachesArticleGarcía, C., Jovanovic, N., Teich, I., Fink, M., Dzikiti, S., & Bugan, R. D. (2020). Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555García, CL, Nebojsa Jovanovic, I Teich, M Fink, Sebinasi Dzikiti, and Richard DH Bugan "Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches." (2020) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555García C, Jovanovic N, Teich I, Fink M, Dzikiti S, Bugan RD. Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. 2020; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555.TY - Article AU - García, CL AU - Jovanovic, Nebojsa AU - Teich, I AU - Fink, M AU - Dzikiti, Sebinasi AU - Bugan, Richard DH AB - Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes. DA - 2020-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Evapotranspiration KW - Hydrological modelling KW - Remote sensing LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2020 SM - 0378-4738 SM - 1816-7950 T1 - Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches TI - Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555 ER -