GENERAL ENQUIRIES: Tel: + 27 12 841 2911 | Email: callcentre@csir.co.za

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naicker, Prisha
dc.contributor.author Thopil, GA
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-25T07:07:37Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-25T07:07:37Z
dc.date.issued 2019-07
dc.identifier.citation Naicker, P. and Thopil, G.A. A framework for sustainable utility scale renewable energy selection in South Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 224, pp 637-650. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0959-6526
dc.identifier.issn 1879-1786
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619309679
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.257
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11127
dc.description Copyright: 2019 Elsevier. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, kindly consult the publisher's website. en_US
dc.description.abstract A range of varying criteria with trade-offs need consideration when selecting a suitable renewable energy technology (RET) for a specific area or location. In this study RETs in South Africa, in accordance with the national renewable energy program, were assessed to compare and highlight feasible technology options. A key objective of the study was to develop a framework that could be used to assess the various RETs at utility scale. Important criteria contributing toward the assessment of RETs were identified from literature. The criteria were used within the framework for analysis which consisted of the following factors: technical, economic, environmental, social and political. The goal of assessing RETs in South Africa was located at the top of the framework hierarchy. A total of 15 criteria were identified to use as part of the assessment. A decision-making matrix based on both qualitative and quantitative data was used to score the criteria. The RETs (solar PV, wind, CSP, hydro, biogas and biomass) in South Africa were evaluated with respect to each criterion. The study aims to contribute towards - from a developing country perspective - highlighting key barriers to technology adoption, assist in investment decisions, and ultimately contribute toward a sustainable energy infrastructure. From the analysis performed, solar PV and wind were favoured due to technology maturity and financier perception while CSP also scored favourably due to the potential to meet the baseload energy requirements. The key policy barriers identified that require attention include improved knowledge transfer and better maintenance skills across all technologies while site suitability was identified as a major barrier for hydro and biomass RETs. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;22639
dc.subject Renewable energy en_US
dc.subject Multi-criteria analysis en_US
dc.subject Decision-making matrix en_US
dc.title A framework for sustainable utility scale renewable energy selection in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account