GENERAL ENQUIRIES: Tel: + 27 12 841 2911 | Email: callcentre@csir.co.za

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anele, AO
dc.contributor.author Hamam, Y
dc.contributor.author Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan MI
dc.contributor.author Todini, E
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-16T08:27:46Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-16T08:27:46Z
dc.date.issued 2017-11
dc.identifier.citation Anele, A.O. et al. 2017. Overview, comparative assessment and recommendations of forecasting models for short-term water demand prediction. Watere, vol. 9(11): doi:10.3390/w9110887 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.3390/w9110887
dc.identifier.uri http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/11/887
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10109
dc.description Open access article published in Water, vol. 9(11): doi:10.3390/w9110887 en_US
dc.description.abstract The stochastic nature of water consumption patterns during the day and week varies. Therefore, to continually provide water to consumers with appropriate quality, quantity and pressure, water utilities require accurate and appropriate short-term water demand (STWD) forecasts. In view of this, an overview of forecasting methods for STWD prediction is presented. Based on that, a comparative assessment of the performance of alternative forecasting models from the different methods is studied. Times series models (i.e., autoregressive (AR), moving average (MA), autoregressive-moving average (ARMA), and ARMA with exogenous variable (ARMAX)) introduced by Box and Jenkins (1970), feed-forward back-propagation neural network (FFBP-NN), and hybrid model (i.e., combined forecasts from ARMA and FFBP-NN) are compared with each other for a common set of data. Akaike information criterion (AIC), originally proposed by Akaike (1974) is used to estimate the quality of each short-term forecasting model. Furthermore, Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) model efficiency coefficient proposed by Nash–Sutcliffe (1970), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are the forecasting statistical terms used to assess the predictive performance of the models. Lastly, as regards the selection of an accurate and appropriate STWD forecasting model, this paper provides recommendations and future work based on the forecasts generated by each of the predictive models considered. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI AG en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;20532
dc.subject Forecasting models en_US
dc.subject Water demand simulation en_US
dc.title Overview, comparative assessment and recommendations of forecasting models for short-term water demand prediction en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account