Repository logo
ResearchSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo ResearchSpace
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ResearchSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. browse.metadata.impactarea.breadcrumbs

Browsing by browse.metadata.impactarea "Adv Network Architectures Sys"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Given a SDN topology, how many controllers are needed and where should they go?
    (2018-11) Mamushiane, Lusani; Mwangama, J; Lysko, Albert A
    Software Defined Networking (SDN) presents a paradigm shift in network management and configuration. The idea of having an externalized control plane opens many unanswered questions regarding scalability, fault tolerance and performance of the controller. An important question that must be answered is, given a network topology, how many controllers are needed and where should they be placed to satisfy user-specific requirements and constraints. Such requirements range from latency constraints, failure tolerance and fair load distribution. These metrics compete with each other, thus no single best placement is available. In this paper, we focus on controller placement to minimize propagation latency (of control traffic) and CapEx associated with installing a new controller. We apply Silhouette Analysis and Gap statistics to compute the optimal number of controllers to use for a given topology. To determine the optimal locations to place the controllers, we use Partition Around Medoids (PAM) clustering algorithm. We evaluate our solution using the Internet2 topology and then expand our scope to over 10 publicly available WAN topologies. As expected, the answers to controller placement are topology-dependent. However, an evaluation of our algorithms on the Internet 2 topology, recommends two controllers as the optimal number of controllers to use. Surprisingly, our results indicate that one controller suffices to meet latency requirements (though certainly not reliability requirements). Finally, the techniques presented in this work can be extended to tackle other similar placement problems, such as baseband unit placement for 5G cloud radio access network (C-RAN) deployment and fog node placement which appears in the context of edge computing.
Quick Links
  • About us
  • Research & development
  • Work with us
  • Hosted sector initiatives
  • Careers
  • Publications
  • Multimedia
  • Contact
  • News
Legislation and compliance
  • Legal notice and disclaimer
  • Privacy notice
  • PAIA manual
  • Site map
  • Tenders
  • CSIR: Copyright
General Enquiries

Tel: + 27 12 841 2911
Email: callcentre@csir.co.za

Physical Address
Meiring Naudé Road
Brummeria
Pretoria
South Africa

Postal Address
PO Box 395
Pretoria 0001
South Africa

Social Connect

facebookyoutubetwitterlinkedininstagram

Copyright © CSIR 2017. All Rights Reserved

Resources on this site are free to download and reuse according to associated licensing provision. Please read the terms and conditions of usage of each resource.

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback