ResearchSpace

Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Aardt, JAN
dc.contributor.author Wynne, RH
dc.contributor.author Oderwald, RG
dc.date.accessioned 2007-07-03T06:32:20Z
dc.date.available 2007-07-03T06:32:20Z
dc.date.issued 2006-05
dc.identifier.citation Van Aardt, JAN, Wynne, RH and Oderwald, RG. 2006. Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis. Forest Science, Vol. 52(6), pp 636-649 en
dc.identifier.issn 0015-749X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/848
dc.description Copyright: 2006 Society of American Foresters en
dc.description.abstract This study assessed a lidar-based, object-oriented (segmentation) approach to forest volume and aboveground biomass modeling. The study area in the Piedmont physiographic region of Virginia is composed of temperate coniferous, deciduous, and mixed stands. Segmentation objects, hierarchical in terms of area and ranging from 0.035 to 5.632 ha/object, were created using a lidar-derived canopy height model. Horizontal point (basal area) samples were used to calculate volume and aboveground biomass. Per-object lidar point (per return height and intensity) distributional parameters were extracted from small-footprint lidar. Adjusted R2 and Mallow’s Cp metrics were used to select models for the range of segmentation results. Selected variables included intensity-based and structurally related first through fifth return height parameters. Object-based modeling (adjusted R2 0.58–0.79; various object sizes) resulted in distinct improvements over stand-based attempts (adjusted R2 0.40–0.73; majority adjusted R2 0.50). Adjusted R2 and RMSE values for deciduous volume (0.59; 51.15 m3/ha) and biomass (0.58; 37.41 Mg/ha) were better than those found for another, plot-based study in the study area. Coniferous R2 values for volume (0.66) and biomass (0.59) were lower than previous studies, which was attributed to variability within the relatively narrow volume range. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Society of American Foresters en
dc.subject Remote sensing en
dc.subject Laser remote measurements en
dc.subject Multi spectral en
dc.subject Biomass en
dc.subject Modelling en
dc.title Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Van Aardt, J., Wynne, R., & Oderwald, R. (2006). Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/848 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Van Aardt, JAN, RH Wynne, and RG Oderwald "Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis." (2006) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/848 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Van Aardt J, Wynne R, Oderwald R. Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis. 2006; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/848. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Van Aardt, JAN AU - Wynne, RH AU - Oderwald, RG AB - This study assessed a lidar-based, object-oriented (segmentation) approach to forest volume and aboveground biomass modeling. The study area in the Piedmont physiographic region of Virginia is composed of temperate coniferous, deciduous, and mixed stands. Segmentation objects, hierarchical in terms of area and ranging from 0.035 to 5.632 ha/object, were created using a lidar-derived canopy height model. Horizontal point (basal area) samples were used to calculate volume and aboveground biomass. Per-object lidar point (per return height and intensity) distributional parameters were extracted from small-footprint lidar. Adjusted R2 and Mallow’s Cp metrics were used to select models for the range of segmentation results. Selected variables included intensity-based and structurally related first through fifth return height parameters. Object-based modeling (adjusted R2 0.58–0.79; various object sizes) resulted in distinct improvements over stand-based attempts (adjusted R2 0.40–0.73; majority adjusted R2 0.50). Adjusted R2 and RMSE values for deciduous volume (0.59; 51.15 m3/ha) and biomass (0.58; 37.41 Mg/ha) were better than those found for another, plot-based study in the study area. Coniferous R2 values for volume (0.66) and biomass (0.59) were lower than previous studies, which was attributed to variability within the relatively narrow volume range. DA - 2006-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Remote sensing KW - Laser remote measurements KW - Multi spectral KW - Biomass KW - Modelling LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2006 SM - 0015-749X T1 - Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis TI - Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/848 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record