DSpace
 

Researchspace >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/842

Title: Comparative analysis of components incorporated in conservation priority assessments: a case study based on South African species of terrestrial mammals
Authors: Keith, M
Chimimba, CT
Reyers, B
Van Jaarsveld, AS
Keywords: Regional conservation priorities
Conservation priority assessments
Threat assessment
Terrestrial mammals
Issue Date: Apr-2007
Publisher: Zoological Society of Southern Africa
Citation: Keith, M et al. 2007. Comparative analysis of components incorporated in conservation priority assessments: a case study based on South African species of terrestrial mammals. African Zoology, Vol. 42(1), pp 97-111
Abstract: Assessing the risk of extinction to species forms an essential part of regional conservation initiatives that facilitate the allocation of limited resources for conservation. The present study conducted conservation priority assessments for 221 South African terrestrial mammal species using existing data sources. These data sources included regional IUCN Red List assessments, regional geographic distributions, relative endemism, taxonomic distinctiveness, relative body mass and human density. These omponents were in turn subjected to two quantitative conservation priority assessment techniques in an attempt to determine regional conservation priorities for South African terrestrial mammals. The top 22 mammal species that is the top 10% of assessed species identified by both regional conservation priority assessment techniques to be of conservation priority, consistently identified 13 South African terrestrial mammal species to be of high conservation priority. Seven of the 13 species were from the order Afrosoricida, two species from the order Eulipotyphla, with one species each from the orders Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Pholidota, and Rodentia. More importantly, 12 of the 13 mammal species were also listed as threatened in the 2004 Red Data Book of South African Mammals. These results suggest that the two conservation priority assessment techniques used in the present study may represent a practical and quantitative method for determining regional conservation priorities, and include measures that represent vulnerability, conservation value, and threat
Description: Copyright: 2007 Zoological Society of Southern Africa
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/842
ISSN: 1562-7020
Appears in Collections:Environmental management
General science, engineering & technology

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Keith_2007.pdf550.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback