ResearchSpace

Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmed, Rayeesa
dc.contributor.author Pandelani, Thanyani A
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-12T09:49:55Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-12T09:49:55Z
dc.date.issued 2014-09
dc.identifier.citation Ahmed, R. and Pandelani, T.A. 2014. Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor. In: South African Ballistics Organisation Conference, Zebra Country Lodge, Gauteng, South Africa, 29 September – 1 October 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7908
dc.description South African Ballistics Organisation Conference, Zebra Country Lodge, Gauteng, South Africa, 29 September – 1 October 2014. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. en_US
dc.description.abstract Seats in protected vehicles play a large role in transferring or mitigating forces on occupants due to explosive loading. The protection levels offered by protected seat systems are conventionally evaluated by means of drop testing, where the forces, moments and accelerations on an occupant are measured using an Anthropomorphic Testing Device (ATD). These measurements are then correlated to injury criteria which determine the probability of injury. Seats are typically evaluated in terms of probability of injury to the spine. The Dynamic Response Index (DRI) is the injury criterion most used to determine probability of spinal damage of an occupant due to blast loading; however shortcomings of this criterion have been shown in practical applications. The criterion does not account for additional masses due to PPE, nor does it account for additionally induced loads such as that caused by restraint systems, nor does it account for effects of countermeasures affecting the applied local force. The DRI also assumes that the load applied is axial in nature and thus does not take into account misalignments of the spine. Alternative injury criteria for spinal damage have been proposed such as the Lumbar Spine Force Criterion (LSFC) and the newly proposed Spine Injury Criterion (SIC). These, together with the DRI, were used to evaluate seat protection levels during a comparative seat testing study. The results of the study show that the SIC appears to produce more consistent results, in line with what the expected behaviour of the seats should be. The DRI performed less consistently and in some cases indicated that an occupant in the baseline steel seat would measure a higher DRI than an occupant of the cushioned seats. Until the SIC can be fully validated, it is recommended that the SIC is used as an additional criterion for injury assessment, especially in configurations whereby restraining systems and/or PPE are used, rather than looking at DRI alone. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BISRU en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;14062
dc.subject ATD en_US
dc.subject Anthropomorphic testing device en_US
dc.subject DRI en_US
dc.subject Dynamic response index en_US
dc.subject SIC en_US
dc.subject Spinal injury criterion en_US
dc.title Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Ahmed, R., & Pandelani, T. A. (2014). Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor. BISRU. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7908 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Ahmed, Rayeesa, and Thanyani A Pandelani. "Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor." (2014): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7908 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Ahmed R, Pandelani TA, Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor; BISRU; 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7908 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Ahmed, Rayeesa AU - Pandelani, Thanyani A AB - Seats in protected vehicles play a large role in transferring or mitigating forces on occupants due to explosive loading. The protection levels offered by protected seat systems are conventionally evaluated by means of drop testing, where the forces, moments and accelerations on an occupant are measured using an Anthropomorphic Testing Device (ATD). These measurements are then correlated to injury criteria which determine the probability of injury. Seats are typically evaluated in terms of probability of injury to the spine. The Dynamic Response Index (DRI) is the injury criterion most used to determine probability of spinal damage of an occupant due to blast loading; however shortcomings of this criterion have been shown in practical applications. The criterion does not account for additional masses due to PPE, nor does it account for additionally induced loads such as that caused by restraint systems, nor does it account for effects of countermeasures affecting the applied local force. The DRI also assumes that the load applied is axial in nature and thus does not take into account misalignments of the spine. Alternative injury criteria for spinal damage have been proposed such as the Lumbar Spine Force Criterion (LSFC) and the newly proposed Spine Injury Criterion (SIC). These, together with the DRI, were used to evaluate seat protection levels during a comparative seat testing study. The results of the study show that the SIC appears to produce more consistent results, in line with what the expected behaviour of the seats should be. The DRI performed less consistently and in some cases indicated that an occupant in the baseline steel seat would measure a higher DRI than an occupant of the cushioned seats. Until the SIC can be fully validated, it is recommended that the SIC is used as an additional criterion for injury assessment, especially in configurations whereby restraining systems and/or PPE are used, rather than looking at DRI alone. DA - 2014-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - ATD KW - Anthropomorphic testing device KW - DRI KW - Dynamic response index KW - SIC KW - Spinal injury criterion LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2014 T1 - Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor TI - Using Dynamic Response Index (DRI) as a spinal injury predictor UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7908 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record