ResearchSpace

Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Keaikitse, M
dc.contributor.author Govender, Nicolin
dc.contributor.author Warrell, J
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-17T09:15:48Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-17T09:15:48Z
dc.date.issued 2013-09
dc.identifier.citation Keaikitse, M., Govender, N. and Warrell, J. 2013. Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms. In: Africon 2013, Mauritius, 9-13 September 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6757615
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7439
dc.description Africon 2013, Mauritius, 9-13 September 2013 en_US
dc.description.abstract Active object recognition aims to manipulate the sensor and its parameters, and interact with the environment and/or the object of interest in order to gather more information to complete the 3D object recognition task as quickly and accurately as possible. It can leverage the mobility of robotic platforms to capture additional viewpoints about an object as single images are not always sufficient especially if objects appear in cluttered human environments. Active vision algorithms should reduce the number of viewpoints required to recognise an object and hence reduce the computational time as well. This paper compares two active object recognition systems. Both systems use SIFT features for object recognition, but use contrasting models, update and viewpoint selection strategies. The methods for integrating information across views used by the two systems are investigated. This is essential as this module is used to select the next best viewpoint. The number of viewpoints and the time taken to recognise objects are used to compare the performance of these two methods. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE Xplore en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;11490
dc.subject 3D object recognition algorithms en_US
dc.subject Active vision en_US
dc.subject Robotic platforms en_US
dc.subject Object recognition en_US
dc.subject Single images en_US
dc.subject Cluttered human environments en_US
dc.subject Active vision algorithms en_US
dc.subject SIFT en_US
dc.title Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Keaikitse, M., Govender, N., & Warrell, J. (2013). Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms. IEEE Xplore. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7439 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Keaikitse, M, Nicolin Govender, and J Warrell. "Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms." (2013): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7439 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Keaikitse M, Govender N, Warrell J, Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms; IEEE Xplore; 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7439 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Keaikitse, M AU - Govender, Nicolin AU - Warrell, J AB - Active object recognition aims to manipulate the sensor and its parameters, and interact with the environment and/or the object of interest in order to gather more information to complete the 3D object recognition task as quickly and accurately as possible. It can leverage the mobility of robotic platforms to capture additional viewpoints about an object as single images are not always sufficient especially if objects appear in cluttered human environments. Active vision algorithms should reduce the number of viewpoints required to recognise an object and hence reduce the computational time as well. This paper compares two active object recognition systems. Both systems use SIFT features for object recognition, but use contrasting models, update and viewpoint selection strategies. The methods for integrating information across views used by the two systems are investigated. This is essential as this module is used to select the next best viewpoint. The number of viewpoints and the time taken to recognise objects are used to compare the performance of these two methods. DA - 2013-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - 3D object recognition algorithms KW - Active vision KW - Robotic platforms KW - Object recognition KW - Single images KW - Cluttered human environments KW - Active vision algorithms KW - SIFT LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2013 T1 - Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms TI - Comparison of active SIFT-based 3D object recognition algorithms UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7439 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record