Researchspace >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4917

Title: Impact of communal land use and conservation on woody vegetation structure in the Lowveld savannas of South Africa
Authors: Wessels, KJ
Mathieu, R
Erasmus, BFN
Asner, GP
Smit, IPJ
Van Aardt, JAN
Main, R
Fisher, J
Marais, W
Kennedy-Bowdoin, T
Knapp, DE
Emerson, R
Jacobson, J
Keywords: LiDAR
Fuel wood
Communal landuse
Woody vegetation structure
Kruger National Park
Forest ecology
Forest management
Issue Date: Jan-2011
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Wessels, KL, Mathieu, R, Erasmus, BFN et al. 2011. Impact of communal land use and conservation on woody vegetation structure in the Lowveld savannas of South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 261(1), pp 19-29
Series/Report no.: Workflow request;5236
Abstract: Millions of people rely on savannas for ecosystem services, such as the provision of grazing and fuel wood, so it is important to determine the extent to which utilization affects woody vegetation resources. Using airborne LiDAR from the Carnegie Airborne Observatory (CAO), we quantified and compared tree canopy cover and height distributions between areas of contrasting management in the Lowveld savanna region of South Africa – a region connecting communal landscapes with heavy utilization (especially fuel wood harvesting) to fully protected public (Kruger National Park – KNP) and private reserves (SabiSand Game Reserve – SSGR) that conserve biodiversity. Differences in total woody vegetation cover and cover within functional height classes (1–2 m, 2–3 m, 3–5 m, 5–7mand >7m) were investigated between 7 sites located within (i) conservation areas (in KNP, SSGR), (ii) communal rangelands or (iii) cultivated fields in communal areas. The impact of human utilization on wood resources in the communal areas varied widely between sites. Heavy utilization on gabbro substrate greatly reduced total woody cover of the rangelands, while two other communal rangelands that were presumably less intensively utilised had double the total woody cover of conservation areas. Rangelands and fields in most of the communal sites had more vegetation cover in the 5–7mand >7mclasses than most of the conservation sites, presumably due to the absence of elephants in communal rangelands and the active preservation of large fruiting trees. On granite substrates, which account for the majority of the study area, there was a 50% reduction in woody cover below 5m in communal rangelands. Although large trees were clearly being conserved in communal rangelands and fields, there was a relatively low cover of vegetation below 5m, which raise doubts about recruitment and long-term sustainability of the tree resources. These results in conjunction with other studies based on theCAOLiDAR data for experimental burn plots and largemammalexclosures in KNP, suggest that communal land use on granite substrates have a higher impact on the woody cover below 5m than both elephants and fire.
Description: Copyright: 2011 Elsevier. This is the post print version of the work. The definitive version is published in Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 261(1), pp 19-29
URI: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T6X-51B8G7V-1-9&_cdi=5042&_user=958262&_pii=S037811271000544X&_origin=search&_coverDate=01%2F01%2F2011&_sk=997389998&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzW-zSkWb&md5=f3bdda9cd2c092914efb8268fba5aacc&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
ISSN: 0378-1127
Appears in Collections:Forestry and wood science
Earth observation
Ecosystems processes & dynamics
General science, engineering & technology

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Wessels_2010.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback