ResearchSpace

Tangible interfaces for tangible robots

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Smith, Andrew C
dc.date.accessioned 2010-09-10T11:57:49Z
dc.date.available 2010-09-10T11:57:49Z
dc.date.issued 2010-04
dc.identifier.citation Smith, AC. 2010. Tangible interfaces for tangible robots, Advances in Robot Manipulators, Ernest Hall (Ed.). INTECH, pp 607-624 en
dc.identifier.isbn 978-953-307-070-4
dc.identifier.uri http://sciyo.com/articles/show/title/tangible-interfaces-for-tangible-robots
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4351
dc.description Smith, AC. 2010. Tangible interfaces for tangible robots, Advances in Robot Manipulators, Ernest Hall (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-070-4, INTECH, Available from: http://sciyo.com/articles/show/title/tangible-interfaces-for-tangible-robots en
dc.description.abstract Various modes of tangible interfaces have been explored and researched. In this paper we limit our look at tangible user interfaces to a subset of these. The subset is characterised by portability and no attached tethers, be they mechanical links or electrical wires. The subset does include tangible objects that are connected to a larger system for the purpose of relative position and orientation detection, if relevant. Such detection mechanisms include optical, magnetic, and radio means. Examples of optical detection are the use of fibre optics and a video camera. Magnetic detection utilises the presence of a magnetic field, or the changes in such a field. Radio detection mechanisms include the use of the Global Positioning System (GPS) and radio frequency identification (RFID). Using electrically conductive pins provides for another untethered system. Electrical field sensing and the use of acoustic waves are also covered in this chapter. In our discussion we assume open-loop control of robot manipulators, that is, the user interface does not receive feedback from sensing subsytems. The user interface relies on other subsytems to check the inputs provided by the user interface with the actual position of the manipulator. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher INTECH en
dc.subject Robot manipulators en
dc.subject Tangible interfaces en
dc.subject Global positioning system en
dc.subject Radio frequency identification en
dc.subject Radio detection mechanisms en
dc.subject Electrical field sensing en
dc.subject Detection mechanisms en
dc.title Tangible interfaces for tangible robots en
dc.type Book Chapter en
dc.identifier.apacitation Smith, A. C. (2010). Tangible interfaces for tangible robots., <i></i> INTECH. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4351 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Smith, Andrew C. "Tangible interfaces for tangible robots" In <i></i>, n.p.: INTECH. 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4351. en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Smith AC. Tangible interfaces for tangible robots. [place unknown]: INTECH; 2010. [cited yyyy month dd]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4351. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Book Chapter AU - Smith, Andrew C AB - Various modes of tangible interfaces have been explored and researched. In this paper we limit our look at tangible user interfaces to a subset of these. The subset is characterised by portability and no attached tethers, be they mechanical links or electrical wires. The subset does include tangible objects that are connected to a larger system for the purpose of relative position and orientation detection, if relevant. Such detection mechanisms include optical, magnetic, and radio means. Examples of optical detection are the use of fibre optics and a video camera. Magnetic detection utilises the presence of a magnetic field, or the changes in such a field. Radio detection mechanisms include the use of the Global Positioning System (GPS) and radio frequency identification (RFID). Using electrically conductive pins provides for another untethered system. Electrical field sensing and the use of acoustic waves are also covered in this chapter. In our discussion we assume open-loop control of robot manipulators, that is, the user interface does not receive feedback from sensing subsytems. The user interface relies on other subsytems to check the inputs provided by the user interface with the actual position of the manipulator. DA - 2010-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Robot manipulators KW - Tangible interfaces KW - Global positioning system KW - Radio frequency identification KW - Radio detection mechanisms KW - Electrical field sensing KW - Detection mechanisms LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2010 SM - 978-953-307-070-4 T1 - Tangible interfaces for tangible robots TI - Tangible interfaces for tangible robots UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4351 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record