ResearchSpace

Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Greeff, M
dc.contributor.author Engelbrecht, AP
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-09T14:36:03Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-09T14:36:03Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Greeff, M and Engelbrecht, AP. 2009. Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO. Studies in Computational Intelligence, (Series Ed: Kacprzyk, Janusz), pp 105-123 en
dc.identifier.issn 1860-949X
dc.identifier.uri http://www.springer.com/series/7092
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3938
dc.description Copyright: 2010 Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. Permission to archive this author version is granted by Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media en
dc.description.abstract Optimisation problems occur in many situations and aspects of modern life. In reality, many of these problems are dynamic in nature, where changes can occur in the environment that influences the solutions of the optimisation problem. Many methods use a weighted average approach to the multiple objectives. However, generally a dynamic multi-objective optimisation problem (DMOOP) does not have a single solution. In many cases the objectives (or goals) are in conflict with one another, where an improvement in one objective leads to a worse solution for at least one of the other objectives. The set of solutions that can be found where no other solution is better for all the objectives is called the Pareto optimal front (POF) and the solutions are called non-dominated solutions. The goal when solving a DMOOP is not to find a single solution, but to find the POF. This chapter introduces the usage of the vector evaluated particle swarm optimiser (VEPSO) to solve DMOOPs. Every objective is solved by one swarm and the swarms share knowledge amongst each other about the objective that it is solving. Not much work has been done on using this approach in dynamic environments. This chapter discusses this approach, as well as the effect that various ways of transferring knowledge between the swarms, together with the population size and various response methods to a detected change, have on the performance of the algorithm. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media en
dc.subject Dynamic multi-objective optimisation en
dc.subject Pareto optimal front en
dc.subject Vector evaluated particle swarm optimiser en
dc.subject Dynamic multi-objective optimisation problem en
dc.subject DMOOP en
dc.subject Particle swarm optimisation en
dc.subject PSO en
dc.title Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO en
dc.type Book Chapter en
dc.identifier.apacitation Greeff, M., & Engelbrecht, A. (2010). Dynamic multi-Objective optimisation using PSO., <i></i> Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3938 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Greeff, M, and AP Engelbrecht. "Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO" In <i></i>, n.p.: Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3938. en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Greeff M, Engelbrecht A. Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO. [place unknown]: Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media; 2010. [cited yyyy month dd]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3938. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Book Chapter AU - Greeff, M AU - Engelbrecht, AP AB - Optimisation problems occur in many situations and aspects of modern life. In reality, many of these problems are dynamic in nature, where changes can occur in the environment that influences the solutions of the optimisation problem. Many methods use a weighted average approach to the multiple objectives. However, generally a dynamic multi-objective optimisation problem (DMOOP) does not have a single solution. In many cases the objectives (or goals) are in conflict with one another, where an improvement in one objective leads to a worse solution for at least one of the other objectives. The set of solutions that can be found where no other solution is better for all the objectives is called the Pareto optimal front (POF) and the solutions are called non-dominated solutions. The goal when solving a DMOOP is not to find a single solution, but to find the POF. This chapter introduces the usage of the vector evaluated particle swarm optimiser (VEPSO) to solve DMOOPs. Every objective is solved by one swarm and the swarms share knowledge amongst each other about the objective that it is solving. Not much work has been done on using this approach in dynamic environments. This chapter discusses this approach, as well as the effect that various ways of transferring knowledge between the swarms, together with the population size and various response methods to a detected change, have on the performance of the algorithm. DA - 2010 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Dynamic multi-objective optimisation KW - Pareto optimal front KW - Vector evaluated particle swarm optimiser KW - Dynamic multi-objective optimisation problem KW - DMOOP KW - Particle swarm optimisation KW - PSO LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2010 SM - 1860-949X T1 - Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO TI - Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using PSO UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3938 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record