ResearchSpace

Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Miya, WS
dc.contributor.author Mpanza, LJ
dc.contributor.author Marwala, T
dc.contributor.author Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo V
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-01T08:23:15Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-01T08:23:15Z
dc.date.issued 2008-10
dc.identifier.citation Miya, WS, Mpanza, LJ et al. 2008. Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2008), 12-15 Oct 2008, Singapore, pp 1954-1959 en
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-4244-2384-2
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3924
dc.description Copyright: 2008 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. en
dc.description.abstract In this paper, a comparison between Extension Neural Network (ENN), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and Hidden Markov model (HMM) is conducted for bushing condition monitoring. The monitoring process is a two-stage implementation of a classification method. The first stage detects whether the bushing is faulty or normal while the second stage classifies the fault. Experimentation is conducted using dissolve gas-in-oil analysis (DGA) data collected from bushings based on IEEEc57.104; IEC60599 and IEEE production rates methods for oil-impregnated paper (OIP) bushings. It is observed from experimentation that there is no major classification discrepancy between ENN and GMM for the detection stage with classification rates at 87.93% and 87.94% respectively, outperforming HMM which achieved 85.6%. Moreover, HMM fault diagnosis surpasses those of ENN and GMM with a classification of 100%. However, for diagnosis stage HMM outperforms both ENN and GMM with 100% classification rate. ENN and GMM have considerably faster training and classification time whilst HMM's training is time-consuming for both detection and diagnosis stages. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) en
dc.subject Condition monitoring en
dc.subject Hidden markov models en
dc.subject Transformer bushings en
dc.subject Gaussian mixture models en
dc.subject Extension neural networks en
dc.title Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models en
dc.type Conference Presentation en
dc.identifier.apacitation Miya, W., Mpanza, L., Marwala, T., & Nelwamondo, F. V. (2008). Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3924 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Miya, WS, LJ Mpanza, T Marwala, and Fulufhelo V Nelwamondo. "Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models." (2008): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3924 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Miya W, Mpanza L, Marwala T, Nelwamondo FV, Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3924 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Miya, WS AU - Mpanza, LJ AU - Marwala, T AU - Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo V AB - In this paper, a comparison between Extension Neural Network (ENN), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and Hidden Markov model (HMM) is conducted for bushing condition monitoring. The monitoring process is a two-stage implementation of a classification method. The first stage detects whether the bushing is faulty or normal while the second stage classifies the fault. Experimentation is conducted using dissolve gas-in-oil analysis (DGA) data collected from bushings based on IEEEc57.104; IEC60599 and IEEE production rates methods for oil-impregnated paper (OIP) bushings. It is observed from experimentation that there is no major classification discrepancy between ENN and GMM for the detection stage with classification rates at 87.93% and 87.94% respectively, outperforming HMM which achieved 85.6%. Moreover, HMM fault diagnosis surpasses those of ENN and GMM with a classification of 100%. However, for diagnosis stage HMM outperforms both ENN and GMM with 100% classification rate. ENN and GMM have considerably faster training and classification time whilst HMM's training is time-consuming for both detection and diagnosis stages. DA - 2008-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Condition monitoring KW - Hidden markov models KW - Transformer bushings KW - Gaussian mixture models KW - Extension neural networks LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2008 SM - 978-1-4244-2384-2 T1 - Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models TI - Condition monitoring of oil-impregnated paper bushings using extension neural network, Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3924 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record