ResearchSpace

Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Long, Craig S
dc.contributor.author Loveday, Philip W
dc.contributor.author Groenwold, AA
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-02T13:43:42Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-02T13:43:42Z
dc.date.issued 2009-01
dc.identifier.citation Long, CS, Loveday, PW and Groenwold AA. 2009. Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 39(5), pp 487-501 en
dc.identifier.issn 1615-147X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3709
dc.identifier.uri https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-008-0345-1.pdf
dc.identifier.uri DOI 10.1007/s00158-008-0345-1
dc.description Copyright: 2009 Springer-Verlag. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer-Verlag for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in the journal, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 39(5), pp 487-501 en
dc.description.abstract The effects of selected planar finite element formulations, and their associated integration schemes, on the stiffness of a checkerboard material layout are investigated. Standard 4-node bilinear elements, 8- and 9-node quadratic elements, as well as 4-node elements with drilling degrees of freedom are considered. Integration schemes evaluated include popular Gauss quadrature rules, as well as modified 5- and 8-point integration schemes. It is shown that, although checkerboarding may be slightly alleviated when using elements with drilling degrees of freedom, the homogenized checkerboard stiffness is identical to that of standard bilinear elements. This is significant since elements with drilling degrees of freedom are derived from an 8-node parent element. Researchers do however demonstrate that modified reduced integration schemes, applied to quadratic elements, effectively reduce the stiffness of a checkerboard material layout. Furthermore, the proposed schemes effectively suppress spurious zero energy modes which may occur on the element level in topology optimization. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Springer -Verlag en
dc.subject Planar finite element en
dc.subject Checkerboard en
dc.subject Homogenization en
dc.subject Reduced integration en
dc.subject Multidisciplinary optimization en
dc.subject Bilinear elements en
dc.subject Quadratic elements en
dc.subject Gauss quadrature rules en
dc.subject Topology optimization en
dc.title Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Long, C. S., Loveday, P. W., & Groenwold, A. (2009). Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3709 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Long, Craig S, Philip W Loveday, and AA Groenwold "Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3709 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Long CS, Loveday PW, Groenwold A. Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3709. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Long, Craig S AU - Loveday, Philip W AU - Groenwold, AA AB - The effects of selected planar finite element formulations, and their associated integration schemes, on the stiffness of a checkerboard material layout are investigated. Standard 4-node bilinear elements, 8- and 9-node quadratic elements, as well as 4-node elements with drilling degrees of freedom are considered. Integration schemes evaluated include popular Gauss quadrature rules, as well as modified 5- and 8-point integration schemes. It is shown that, although checkerboarding may be slightly alleviated when using elements with drilling degrees of freedom, the homogenized checkerboard stiffness is identical to that of standard bilinear elements. This is significant since elements with drilling degrees of freedom are derived from an 8-node parent element. Researchers do however demonstrate that modified reduced integration schemes, applied to quadratic elements, effectively reduce the stiffness of a checkerboard material layout. Furthermore, the proposed schemes effectively suppress spurious zero energy modes which may occur on the element level in topology optimization. DA - 2009-01 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Planar finite element KW - Checkerboard KW - Homogenization KW - Reduced integration KW - Multidisciplinary optimization KW - Bilinear elements KW - Quadratic elements KW - Gauss quadrature rules KW - Topology optimization LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 SM - 1615-147X T1 - Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts TI - Effects of planar element formulation and numerical integration order on checkerboard material layouts UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3709 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record