dc.contributor.author |
Burgess, IG
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Du Plessis, HW
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-05-26T13:13:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-05-26T13:13:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009-05-26T13:13:44Z |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Burgess, I. & Du Plessis, H. 2009. <i>Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts</i>. (RR 90/225). http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401
|
|
dc.description |
This report is a publication by the National Department of Transport, South Africa, made available by the CSIR |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The travelling public perceives pavement rideability as the primary measure of pavement quality. It is thus necessary to minimise surface unevenness at the construction stage in order not only to improve the public's perception of the quality of the road, but also to lessen the effects of dynamic loading on the pavement and to decrease vehicle operating costs. The present system of quality control of unevenness, the three meter rolling straight-edge, has been questioned as to its effectiveness in this regard. This report summarises the results of Interim Report IR-90/225 and reports on the results of field tests conducted to establish the achievable riding quality levels on new roads. Recommendations for the properties and limits of a bonus penalty scheme based on these achievable riding quality levels are put forward |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
RR 90/225 |
en |
dc.subject |
Riding quality |
en |
dc.subject |
Surface tolerance |
en |
dc.subject |
Bonus-penalty scheme |
en |
dc.subject |
Construction tolerance |
en |
dc.subject |
Rideability quality control |
en |
dc.subject |
Road contracts |
en |
dc.title |
Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts |
en |
dc.type |
Report |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Burgess, I., & Du Plessis, H. (2009). <i>Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts</i> (RR 90/225). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Burgess, IG, and HW Du Plessis <i>Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts.</i> RR 90/225. 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Burgess I, Du Plessis H. Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts. 2009 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Report
AU - Burgess, IG
AU - Du Plessis, HW
AB - The travelling public perceives pavement rideability as the primary measure of pavement quality. It is thus necessary to minimise surface unevenness at the construction stage in order not only to improve the public's perception of the quality of the road, but also to lessen the effects of dynamic loading on the pavement and to decrease vehicle operating costs. The present system of quality control of unevenness, the three meter rolling straight-edge, has been questioned as to its effectiveness in this regard. This report summarises the results of Interim Report IR-90/225 and reports on the results of field tests conducted to establish the achievable riding quality levels on new roads. Recommendations for the properties and limits of a bonus penalty scheme based on these achievable riding quality levels are put forward
DA - 2009-05-26T13:13:44Z
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Riding quality
KW - Surface tolerance
KW - Bonus-penalty scheme
KW - Construction tolerance
KW - Rideability quality control
KW - Road contracts
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2009
T1 - Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts
TI - Guidelines for enforcing rideability quality control on road contracts
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3401
ER -
|
en_ZA |