ResearchSpace

Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gibberd, Jeremy T
dc.date.accessioned 2009-01-23T07:31:19Z
dc.date.available 2009-01-23T07:31:19Z
dc.date.issued 2008-09
dc.identifier.citation Gibberd, JT. 2008. Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes. World Sustainable Building Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 21-25 September 2008, pp 6 en
dc.identifier.isbn 978646503721
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2882
dc.description World Sustainable Building Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 21-25 September 2008 en
dc.description.abstract The Sustainable Building Assessment Tool (SBAT) was developed to ascertain the performance of buildings in terms of their contribution to sustainable development. In particular, the tool focuses on a developing country context and includes social and economic criteria as well as environmental indicators. The paper reviews definitions of sustainable development and current measures of global and national sustainability performance and compares this to criteria used in the SBAT. It shows that the SBAT is reasonable well aligned with these definitions and measures and identifies a number of areas where alignment could be improved. The paper suggests that the tool is reflects progress within the wider field of sustainability performance measurement. Here, environmental sustainability performance measurement is now well defined and can be ascertained in objective and detailed ways through ecological footprints and carbon emissions measurement and calculations. Social and economic sustainability measurement however is still difficult to measure and there are a range of competing systems such as the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI). While there is a general consensus and appropriate measurement system for social and economic sustainability at global or national scale it will be difficult to finalize these aspects in assessment tools that aim to measure sustainability in buildings. The paper argues however that this should not be an excuse to leave out social and economic indicators in building sustainability assessment tools. It suggests instead that these criteria are important and should be developed, particularly in developing countries, as buildings and construction can make substantial contributions to local economic and social sustainable development. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Sustainable building en
dc.subject Assessment tool en
dc.title Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes en
dc.type Other Material en
dc.identifier.apacitation Gibberd, J. T. 2008. <i>Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2882 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Gibberd, Jeremy T. 2008. <i>Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2882 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Gibberd JT. 2008. <i>Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2882 en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Other Material AU - Gibberd, Jeremy T AB - The Sustainable Building Assessment Tool (SBAT) was developed to ascertain the performance of buildings in terms of their contribution to sustainable development. In particular, the tool focuses on a developing country context and includes social and economic criteria as well as environmental indicators. The paper reviews definitions of sustainable development and current measures of global and national sustainability performance and compares this to criteria used in the SBAT. It shows that the SBAT is reasonable well aligned with these definitions and measures and identifies a number of areas where alignment could be improved. The paper suggests that the tool is reflects progress within the wider field of sustainability performance measurement. Here, environmental sustainability performance measurement is now well defined and can be ascertained in objective and detailed ways through ecological footprints and carbon emissions measurement and calculations. Social and economic sustainability measurement however is still difficult to measure and there are a range of competing systems such as the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI). While there is a general consensus and appropriate measurement system for social and economic sustainability at global or national scale it will be difficult to finalize these aspects in assessment tools that aim to measure sustainability in buildings. The paper argues however that this should not be an excuse to leave out social and economic indicators in building sustainability assessment tools. It suggests instead that these criteria are important and should be developed, particularly in developing countries, as buildings and construction can make substantial contributions to local economic and social sustainable development. DA - 2008-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Sustainable building KW - Assessment tool LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2008 SM - 978646503721 T1 - Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes TI - Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2882 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record