dc.contributor.author |
Ortlepp, WD
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-12-14T07:18:25Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-12-14T07:18:25Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2000-08 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Ortlepp, WD. 2000. Realistic dynamic stope support testing. Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee, GAP 611, August, 2000, pp 1-33 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1790
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
The development project GAP 611 comprised essentially four phases: design, construction, proof testing and a brief programmed of testing of actual supports.
The project was driven by the perception that existing support testing equipment could provide only a quality control function. To stimulate development of innovative types of support and support accessories that would overcome some of the limitations of existing systems, required the development and construction of a completely different type of facility. The two most important differences compared with conventional testing procedures would be the provision of a discontinuous roof surface which would be subjected to dynamic loading. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
SIMRAC |
en |
dc.subject |
GAP 611 |
en |
dc.subject |
Stope support testing |
en |
dc.subject |
Dynamic loading |
en |
dc.title |
Realistic dynamic stope support testing |
en |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Ortlepp, W. (2000). Realistic dynamic stope support testing. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1790 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Ortlepp, WD. "Realistic dynamic stope support testing." (2000): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1790 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Ortlepp W, Realistic dynamic stope support testing; 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1790 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Ortlepp, WD
AB - The development project GAP 611 comprised essentially four phases: design, construction, proof testing and a brief programmed of testing of actual supports.
The project was driven by the perception that existing support testing equipment could provide only a quality control function. To stimulate development of innovative types of support and support accessories that would overcome some of the limitations of existing systems, required the development and construction of a completely different type of facility. The two most important differences compared with conventional testing procedures would be the provision of a discontinuous roof surface which would be subjected to dynamic loading.
DA - 2000-08
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - SIMRAC
KW - GAP 611
KW - Stope support testing
KW - Dynamic loading
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2000
T1 - Realistic dynamic stope support testing
TI - Realistic dynamic stope support testing
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1790
ER -
|
en_ZA |