DSpace
 

Researchspace >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1675

Title: Evaluation of 10 cross-shore sediment transport morphological models
Authors: Schoonees, JS
Theron, AK
Keywords: Cross-shore transport models
Beach profile changes
Coastal Engineering
Morphological models
Issue Date: May-1995
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
Citation: Schoonees, JS and Theron, AK. 1995. Evaluation of 10 cross-shore sediment transport morphological models. Coastal Engineering, vol. 25, 02 January, pp 1-41
Abstract: Cross-shore sediment transport models are used to model beach profile changes in order to determine, for example, coastal set-back lines, behaviour of beach fill and beach profile variations adjacent to coastal structures. A study was undertaken to evaluate ten of the most well-known mathematical cross-shore transport models with regard to different model requirements. The characteristics of these time-dependent models were investigated and the pros and cons of each are listed. The ranges of the data used to verify and calibrate these models are noted. It is concluded that the models can be classified generally into three groups with regard to their theoretical basis (Re. mainly sediment transport) and the extent to which they were verified (re. mainly morphodynamics). These groups are termed the ''best'', ''acceptable'' and ''less suitable'' groups. However, it is very important to consider the specific purpose of a model application. In some instances one model may perform better while for a different purpose another model may be better. Data are generally lacking for accretionary events and for erosion cases where the significant wave heights exceed 2.5 m. Aspects presently usually not included in these models are also listed. Without direct comparative prototype tests the final conclusion as to which are the better models in practice cannot be given. Furthermore models may be best applicable under different specific conditions. Models are also constantly being improved and thus a comparative evaluation of the models can only be completely accurate for a relatively short time.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1675
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1675
ISSN: 0378-3839
Appears in Collections:Coastal and marine systems
General science, engineering & technology

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
schoonees 1_1995.pdf3.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback