ResearchSpace

Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Skosana, Vusi J
dc.contributor.author Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan MI
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-24T07:52:01Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-24T07:52:01Z
dc.date.issued 2021-11
dc.identifier.citation Skosana, V. & Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. 2021. Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-6654-4829-1
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-6654-0304-7
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.1109/ISNCC52172.2021.9615804
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237
dc.description.abstract Video encoding is challenging in the energy-constrained environments Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSN) operate. Among the many design considerations when developing a video encoding scheme, the first is the sparsity transform, however, the question of which transform is most suitable has not been conclusively answered. Three of the most popular transforms in video encoding literature, discrete cosine (DCT), discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and discrete Tchebichef transform (DTT) were tested against each other under low sampling rates using compressed sensing techniques. The transforms were evaluated using image quality and energy consumption. The image quality was measured using both peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). The energy consumption was evaluated using the TelosB mote as a reference. The DCT transform had the best image quality at all the sampling rates while the DTT had the worst performance and failed to recover the image at very low sampling rates. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the DTT had higher energy consumption than the DCT. Another remarkable finding was that at high distortion, PSNR was a better predictor of image quality than SSIM. Overall, the DCT was shown to be best image transform in terms of both image quality and energy consumption. en_US
dc.format Abstract en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9615804 en_US
dc.source International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 31 October - 2 November 2021 en_US
dc.subject Compressive sensing en_US
dc.subject Image compression en_US
dc.subject Video encoding en_US
dc.subject Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks en_US
dc.subject WMSN en_US
dc.title Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.description.pages 7 en_US
dc.description.note ©2021 IEEE. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. en_US
dc.description.cluster Next Generation Enterprises & Institutions en_US
dc.description.impactarea EDTRC Management en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Skosana, V., & Abu-Mahfouz, A. M. (2021). Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Skosana, V, and Adnan MI Abu-Mahfouz. "Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates." <i>International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 31 October - 2 November 2021</i> (2021): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Skosana V, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Skosana, V AU - Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan MI AB - Video encoding is challenging in the energy-constrained environments Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSN) operate. Among the many design considerations when developing a video encoding scheme, the first is the sparsity transform, however, the question of which transform is most suitable has not been conclusively answered. Three of the most popular transforms in video encoding literature, discrete cosine (DCT), discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and discrete Tchebichef transform (DTT) were tested against each other under low sampling rates using compressed sensing techniques. The transforms were evaluated using image quality and energy consumption. The image quality was measured using both peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). The energy consumption was evaluated using the TelosB mote as a reference. The DCT transform had the best image quality at all the sampling rates while the DTT had the worst performance and failed to recover the image at very low sampling rates. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the DTT had higher energy consumption than the DCT. Another remarkable finding was that at high distortion, PSNR was a better predictor of image quality than SSIM. Overall, the DCT was shown to be best image transform in terms of both image quality and energy consumption. DA - 2021-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 31 October - 2 November 2021 KW - Compressive sensing KW - Image compression KW - Video encoding KW - Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks KW - WMSN LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2021 SM - 978-1-6654-4829-1 SM - 978-1-6654-0304-7 T1 - Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates TI - Performance comparison of video encoding at low sampling rates UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12237 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 25218 en_US


Files in this item

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record