|
Researchspace >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >
General science, engineering & technology >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1142
|
|
|
| Title: | Prevention and control of tuberculosis in correctional and detention facilities: recommendations from the CDC |
| Authors: | Parsons, S |
| Keywords: | Tuberculosis Health care Correctional services TD prevention |
| Issue Date: | Jul-2006 |
| Publisher: | Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report |
| Citation: | Parsons, S. 2006. Prevention and control of tuberculosis in correctional and detention facilities: recommendations from the CDC. The morbidity and mortality weekly report, Vol. 55(RR-9), 64p |
| Abstract: | Tuberculosis (TB) control can be particularly problematic in correctional and detention facilities, in which persons from diverse
backgrounds and communities are housed in close proximity for varying periods. This report provides a framework and general
guidelines for effective prevention and control of TB in jails, prisons, and other correctional and detention facilities. Recommendations
were developed on the basis of published guidelines and a review of the scientific literature. Effective TB-prevention and
-control measures in correctional facilities include early identification of persons with TB disease through entry and periodic
follow-up screening; successful treatment of TB disease and latent TB infection; appropriate use of airborne precautions (e.g.,
airborne infection isolation, environmental controls, and respiratory protection); comprehensive discharge planning; and thorough
and efficient contact investigation. These measures should be instituted in close collaboration with local or state health
department TB-control programs and other key partners. Continuing education of inmates, detainees, and correctional facility
staff is necessary to maximize cooperation and participation. To ensure TB-prevention and -control measures are effective,
periodic program evaluation should be conducted. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1142 |
| ISSN: | 0091-0031 |
| Appears in Collections: | Building science and technology Architectural sciences General science, engineering & technology
|
Items in Researchspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|